1 00:00:05,710 --> 00:00:03,909 well good morning everybody everybody 2 00:00:10,230 --> 00:00:05,720 welcome to the 3 00:00:11,990 --> 00:00:10,240 2008 director seminar series uh i'm glad 4 00:00:15,190 --> 00:00:12,000 to have you all here 5 00:00:19,510 --> 00:00:15,200 we are inaugurating the use of the new 6 00:00:21,670 --> 00:00:19,520 nai central videocon room uh which is a 7 00:00:24,230 --> 00:00:21,680 really nice facility which marco bolt 8 00:00:26,470 --> 00:00:24,240 and shige abe had a lot to do with 9 00:00:28,790 --> 00:00:26,480 designing and operating so 10 00:00:33,430 --> 00:00:28,800 i hope you'll all have a chance to see 11 00:00:35,110 --> 00:00:33,440 it and we've got a great seminar series 12 00:00:37,270 --> 00:00:35,120 set up for this year 13 00:00:40,150 --> 00:00:37,280 i'll tell you about some of the future 14 00:00:41,990 --> 00:00:40,160 seminars after today's talk 15 00:00:43,590 --> 00:00:42,000 and right now i'd like to introduce 16 00:00:46,310 --> 00:00:43,600 today's speaker 17 00:00:48,310 --> 00:00:46,320 who is dave hollenbach from our ames 18 00:00:51,910 --> 00:00:48,320 research center team 19 00:00:53,910 --> 00:00:51,920 dave is a an expert on the formation of 20 00:00:55,189 --> 00:00:53,920 protoplanetary disks and stellar 21 00:00:58,869 --> 00:00:55,199 formation 22 00:01:01,750 --> 00:00:58,879 and the effects of protoplanetary disk 23 00:01:03,510 --> 00:01:01,760 processes on planetary formation and 24 00:01:06,230 --> 00:01:03,520 he's going to be talking with us 25 00:01:08,469 --> 00:01:06,240 about that today he has a bachelor's 26 00:01:11,030 --> 00:01:08,479 degree from hope college a phd in 27 00:01:13,910 --> 00:01:11,040 theoretical physics from cornell 28 00:01:16,310 --> 00:01:13,920 and was a postdoc at harvard before 29 00:01:18,310 --> 00:01:16,320 coming out here to ames he's been 30 00:01:21,749 --> 00:01:18,320 involved in a great many spacecraft 31 00:01:23,109 --> 00:01:21,759 missions including kao and swas and iso 32 00:01:25,190 --> 00:01:23,119 and certif 33 00:01:27,350 --> 00:01:25,200 and in particular he's a co-investigator 34 00:01:29,109 --> 00:01:27,360 on the certified legacy program 35 00:01:30,390 --> 00:01:29,119 formation and evolution of planetary 36 00:01:32,310 --> 00:01:30,400 systems 37 00:01:34,789 --> 00:01:32,320 and today he's going to be talking with 38 00:01:37,270 --> 00:01:34,799 us about the effect of protoplanetary 39 00:01:39,670 --> 00:01:37,280 disk dispersion on planet formation and 40 00:01:41,590 --> 00:01:39,680 i'll turn it over to dave 41 00:01:43,510 --> 00:01:41,600 thank you carl 42 00:01:45,590 --> 00:01:43,520 uh so this is my first video con and 43 00:01:47,830 --> 00:01:45,600 this will be interesting experience 44 00:01:49,389 --> 00:01:47,840 and i'm very happy to talk a bit about 45 00:01:52,069 --> 00:01:49,399 the sort of the first question that 46 00:01:53,749 --> 00:01:52,079 astrobiologists asked which is 47 00:01:55,590 --> 00:01:53,759 you know what stars are going to have 48 00:01:57,510 --> 00:01:55,600 habitable planets what types of stars 49 00:01:59,910 --> 00:01:57,520 and what are the conditions 50 00:02:02,069 --> 00:01:59,920 that make it favorable for habitable 51 00:02:04,230 --> 00:02:02,079 planets to form around stars and what 52 00:02:05,350 --> 00:02:04,240 places may there be unfavorable 53 00:02:06,550 --> 00:02:05,360 conditions 54 00:02:08,550 --> 00:02:06,560 now you can approach this in an 55 00:02:10,710 --> 00:02:08,560 observational way or a theoretical way i 56 00:02:12,630 --> 00:02:10,720 mean observationally jeff marcy and the 57 00:02:14,390 --> 00:02:12,640 planet hunters have been looking just to 58 00:02:15,430 --> 00:02:14,400 see which stars have planets and where 59 00:02:16,790 --> 00:02:15,440 they are 60 00:02:18,949 --> 00:02:16,800 but we'd like to understand it 61 00:02:20,869 --> 00:02:18,959 theoretically of why 62 00:02:22,470 --> 00:02:20,879 why plants form around certain stars and 63 00:02:24,390 --> 00:02:22,480 that's sort of the kind of work that i'm 64 00:02:27,190 --> 00:02:24,400 going to be describing today and as carl 65 00:02:30,869 --> 00:02:27,200 mentioned i'm part of the nasa ames 66 00:02:33,190 --> 00:02:30,879 astrology team dave demare the pi 67 00:02:35,190 --> 00:02:33,200 so just to start off since we're an 68 00:02:36,630 --> 00:02:35,200 interdisciplinary group i thought i'd 69 00:02:38,070 --> 00:02:36,640 start off by 70 00:02:40,309 --> 00:02:38,080 talking a little bit about just the 71 00:02:43,350 --> 00:02:40,319 basics of planet formation 72 00:02:45,670 --> 00:02:43,360 that we astronomers uh now sort of have 73 00:02:46,710 --> 00:02:45,680 evolved this this this picture of planet 74 00:02:49,110 --> 00:02:46,720 formation 75 00:02:51,589 --> 00:02:49,120 and i'll try not to use any uh jargon 76 00:02:53,990 --> 00:02:51,599 that non-astronomer will not understand 77 00:02:55,270 --> 00:02:54,000 but if you feel free to ask questions if 78 00:02:57,270 --> 00:02:55,280 i forget 79 00:02:59,110 --> 00:02:57,280 i'm going to try to use this laser 80 00:03:00,949 --> 00:02:59,120 pointer i hope you can all see this 81 00:03:03,190 --> 00:03:00,959 there's a little red dot 82 00:03:04,630 --> 00:03:03,200 to point to things so that if you're 83 00:03:06,149 --> 00:03:04,640 looking at my view graphs you'll see 84 00:03:08,470 --> 00:03:06,159 them 85 00:03:10,229 --> 00:03:08,480 so the picture is is that in the in the 86 00:03:13,030 --> 00:03:10,239 galaxy in the interstellar medium there 87 00:03:14,630 --> 00:03:13,040 are clouds of molecules and dust 88 00:03:17,190 --> 00:03:14,640 particles these dust particles are less 89 00:03:19,750 --> 00:03:17,200 than a micron in size and they typically 90 00:03:21,830 --> 00:03:19,760 are silicate material or carbonaceous 91 00:03:23,990 --> 00:03:21,840 material uh and 92 00:03:26,630 --> 00:03:24,000 uh but mostly it's uh it's made up of 93 00:03:28,630 --> 00:03:26,640 hydrogen gas these clouds uh and they 94 00:03:30,869 --> 00:03:28,640 become fairly dense and they 95 00:03:33,190 --> 00:03:30,879 they we they form what we call molecular 96 00:03:35,030 --> 00:03:33,200 cloud cores which are quite dense and 97 00:03:37,270 --> 00:03:35,040 their sizes are in the order of a tenth 98 00:03:39,509 --> 00:03:37,280 of a parsec which astronomers use 99 00:03:42,309 --> 00:03:39,519 parsecs for distance this is about on 100 00:03:44,229 --> 00:03:42,319 the order of a light year in size 101 00:03:46,869 --> 00:03:44,239 and this material then gravitationally 102 00:03:49,750 --> 00:03:46,879 collapses it has some angular momentum 103 00:03:52,390 --> 00:03:49,760 and it spins and so as it collapses it 104 00:03:54,309 --> 00:03:52,400 forms not just a star but it forms a 105 00:03:56,229 --> 00:03:54,319 disc and in fact it's the disc that 106 00:03:59,110 --> 00:03:56,239 probably feeds the material and makes 107 00:04:01,750 --> 00:03:59,120 the star grow as this collapse proceeds 108 00:04:04,149 --> 00:04:01,760 the materials kind of spirals into hits 109 00:04:05,910 --> 00:04:04,159 the disc and then accretes onto the star 110 00:04:07,910 --> 00:04:05,920 this process takes maybe a hundred 111 00:04:09,030 --> 00:04:07,920 thousand years a few hundred thousand 112 00:04:11,589 --> 00:04:09,040 years 113 00:04:13,830 --> 00:04:11,599 now an astronomical unit which i have a 114 00:04:15,990 --> 00:04:13,840 typo here that should be big a big u 115 00:04:17,349 --> 00:04:16,000 capital a capital u and that will be in 116 00:04:18,789 --> 00:04:17,359 the future view graphs you'll see that 117 00:04:20,390 --> 00:04:18,799 that's an astronomical unit one 118 00:04:21,110 --> 00:04:20,400 astronomical unit is the distance from 119 00:04:29,350 --> 00:04:21,120 the 120 00:04:31,030 --> 00:04:29,360 distance out to pluto 121 00:04:33,590 --> 00:04:31,040 so this gives you a sense of the scale 122 00:04:35,430 --> 00:04:33,600 of this disc around the star then in the 123 00:04:37,670 --> 00:04:35,440 disc you initially have these small 124 00:04:39,830 --> 00:04:37,680 interstellar dust particles and then the 125 00:04:41,830 --> 00:04:39,840 dust particles start to coagulate and 126 00:04:43,110 --> 00:04:41,840 settle to the mid plane due to the 127 00:04:44,950 --> 00:04:43,120 gravity of the star and there's a 128 00:04:47,350 --> 00:04:44,960 tendency to settle they're orbiting in a 129 00:04:48,870 --> 00:04:47,360 keplerian orbits around the star but 130 00:04:51,030 --> 00:04:48,880 they settle to the mid plane and they 131 00:04:53,590 --> 00:04:51,040 coagulate into bigger and bigger rocks 132 00:04:56,230 --> 00:04:53,600 and icy uh particles 133 00:04:58,950 --> 00:04:56,240 and eventually these things coagulate to 134 00:05:02,070 --> 00:04:58,960 form planets in time scales of order of 135 00:05:03,830 --> 00:05:02,080 10 million years now the gas giants like 136 00:05:05,670 --> 00:05:03,840 jupiter may take a little bit different 137 00:05:08,870 --> 00:05:05,680 time scales than planets like the earth 138 00:05:10,790 --> 00:05:08,880 i'll talk about that in the next slides 139 00:05:12,629 --> 00:05:10,800 the um so let's just look at a little 140 00:05:14,390 --> 00:05:12,639 bit at the formation of gas giant 141 00:05:16,469 --> 00:05:14,400 planets there's there's two basic 142 00:05:18,390 --> 00:05:16,479 theories of the formation of gas giant 143 00:05:20,629 --> 00:05:18,400 planets one is that they form a 144 00:05:22,550 --> 00:05:20,639 gravitational instability and the other 145 00:05:24,230 --> 00:05:22,560 is by something called core accretion 146 00:05:26,390 --> 00:05:24,240 i'm going to focus on this talk just on 147 00:05:29,029 --> 00:05:26,400 the core accretion idea 148 00:05:31,189 --> 00:05:29,039 of the formation of gas giant planets 149 00:05:33,670 --> 00:05:31,199 so in this scenario 150 00:05:35,830 --> 00:05:33,680 as i say you have a star with a disk 151 00:05:37,270 --> 00:05:35,840 around it the dust particles settle to 152 00:05:38,550 --> 00:05:37,280 the midplane there's some turbulence 153 00:05:40,310 --> 00:05:38,560 that sort of is 154 00:05:42,390 --> 00:05:40,320 pictured here by these little spirals 155 00:05:44,230 --> 00:05:42,400 they accumulate into planetesimals which 156 00:05:45,189 --> 00:05:44,240 are things that are maybe a kilometer in 157 00:05:46,390 --> 00:05:45,199 size 158 00:05:49,350 --> 00:05:46,400 big enough 159 00:05:50,870 --> 00:05:49,360 that they can now gravitationally focus 160 00:05:53,749 --> 00:05:50,880 particles into them they actually sort 161 00:05:55,749 --> 00:05:53,759 of suck material onto them and then once 162 00:05:57,990 --> 00:05:55,759 that happens you get a sort of a very 163 00:06:00,390 --> 00:05:58,000 rapid growth of these things 164 00:06:01,909 --> 00:06:00,400 that that can grow up to lunar size or 165 00:06:04,150 --> 00:06:01,919 mars size 166 00:06:05,510 --> 00:06:04,160 objects and then 167 00:06:07,510 --> 00:06:05,520 then there's a process where they 168 00:06:10,230 --> 00:06:07,520 collide you can eventually build up up 169 00:06:11,670 --> 00:06:10,240 to sort of 10 to 15 earth mass what we 170 00:06:15,270 --> 00:06:11,680 call cores 171 00:06:16,469 --> 00:06:15,280 uh and so it's just ice rock material 15 172 00:06:18,390 --> 00:06:16,479 earth masses 173 00:06:20,550 --> 00:06:18,400 then its gravity is strong enough that 174 00:06:22,790 --> 00:06:20,560 it can actually attract a hydrogen gas 175 00:06:25,029 --> 00:06:22,800 which is by far the most dominant mass 176 00:06:27,189 --> 00:06:25,039 component of the disc and the gas can 177 00:06:29,909 --> 00:06:27,199 now be gravitationally attracted to this 178 00:06:33,510 --> 00:06:29,919 core and it rapidly can build up things 179 00:06:35,430 --> 00:06:33,520 like jupiter gas rich giants jupiter has 180 00:06:39,029 --> 00:06:35,440 something like 181 00:06:41,749 --> 00:06:39,039 uh 300 earth masses of gas but only 15 182 00:06:43,830 --> 00:06:41,759 earth masses of this sort of rocky icy 183 00:06:45,990 --> 00:06:43,840 core to start with 184 00:06:48,070 --> 00:06:46,000 and that may take a few million years in 185 00:06:49,670 --> 00:06:48,080 fact in the early models of this it took 186 00:06:51,350 --> 00:06:49,680 10 million years and now we're beginning 187 00:06:53,189 --> 00:06:51,360 to realize that discs don't last that 188 00:06:54,710 --> 00:06:53,199 long and so there's been a kind of a 189 00:06:56,870 --> 00:06:54,720 work theoretical work that's being done 190 00:06:58,629 --> 00:06:56,880 to show that actually it can happen in 191 00:07:00,870 --> 00:06:58,639 maybe 3 million years or 200 years i 192 00:07:03,830 --> 00:07:00,880 mean they're pushing it but it does take 193 00:07:05,909 --> 00:07:03,840 some time for this all to happen um so 194 00:07:09,670 --> 00:07:05,919 that's how a gas giant forms like like 195 00:07:11,510 --> 00:07:09,680 jupiter uh the terrestrial planets uh 196 00:07:13,909 --> 00:07:11,520 sort of form in us in something that 197 00:07:15,670 --> 00:07:13,919 goes like step one and step two here 198 00:07:16,550 --> 00:07:15,680 except that you build up these lunar 199 00:07:19,189 --> 00:07:16,560 mass 200 00:07:20,790 --> 00:07:19,199 objects and at that point you only have 201 00:07:23,110 --> 00:07:20,800 sort of a few of them and they tend to 202 00:07:25,270 --> 00:07:23,120 be on eccentric orbits which cross each 203 00:07:27,350 --> 00:07:25,280 other and eventually they'll collide and 204 00:07:28,790 --> 00:07:27,360 merge to form larger and larger planets 205 00:07:30,710 --> 00:07:28,800 like the earth 206 00:07:33,270 --> 00:07:30,720 but that may take tens of millions of 207 00:07:35,430 --> 00:07:33,280 years uh so that that's a slower process 208 00:07:37,589 --> 00:07:35,440 but it doesn't really uh involve the gas 209 00:07:39,270 --> 00:07:37,599 directly it's just these rocks that get 210 00:07:41,110 --> 00:07:39,280 bigger and bigger and crash into each 211 00:07:42,830 --> 00:07:41,120 other and it takes uh somewhat longer 212 00:07:45,830 --> 00:07:42,840 time 213 00:07:48,950 --> 00:07:45,840 so one thing that the gas does affect 214 00:07:50,950 --> 00:07:48,960 though in in terrestrial planets is sort 215 00:07:52,710 --> 00:07:50,960 of how big they can grow and what kind 216 00:07:55,270 --> 00:07:52,720 of orbits they're on 217 00:07:56,790 --> 00:07:55,280 if you have a lot of gas i mean if you 218 00:07:58,629 --> 00:07:56,800 have very little gas 219 00:08:00,230 --> 00:07:58,639 then there's no interaction between 220 00:08:03,990 --> 00:08:00,240 gravitational interaction between the 221 00:08:06,070 --> 00:08:04,000 gas and these uh lunar size objects and 222 00:08:07,830 --> 00:08:06,080 so they do collide they have eccentric 223 00:08:09,270 --> 00:08:07,840 elliptical orbits that cross and they 224 00:08:11,189 --> 00:08:09,280 collide and they smash into each other 225 00:08:12,309 --> 00:08:11,199 in fact you know it was one of the last 226 00:08:14,070 --> 00:08:12,319 collisions that's supposed to have 227 00:08:16,629 --> 00:08:14,080 formed the earth moon system or a sort 228 00:08:19,670 --> 00:08:16,639 of a mars-sized object hit the earth and 229 00:08:21,510 --> 00:08:19,680 it ended up forming an earth moon system 230 00:08:23,589 --> 00:08:21,520 and in this case you can build up fairly 231 00:08:25,749 --> 00:08:23,599 massive terrestrial planets by massive i 232 00:08:27,909 --> 00:08:25,759 mean as massive as the earth or maybe 233 00:08:29,990 --> 00:08:27,919 even a few times as massive as the earth 234 00:08:31,749 --> 00:08:30,000 and they tend to be on elliptical or 235 00:08:33,430 --> 00:08:31,759 eccentric orbits 236 00:08:35,269 --> 00:08:33,440 on the other hand if you have gas 237 00:08:37,750 --> 00:08:35,279 present for tens of millions of years 238 00:08:40,389 --> 00:08:37,760 that this takes and you only need about 239 00:08:41,829 --> 00:08:40,399 a hundredth of a jupiter mass this mj is 240 00:08:43,509 --> 00:08:41,839 a jupiter mass 241 00:08:45,910 --> 00:08:43,519 then the gravitational interaction 242 00:08:48,870 --> 00:08:45,920 between the planet and the gas as sort 243 00:08:51,670 --> 00:08:48,880 of a tidal effect circularizes the orbit 244 00:08:54,070 --> 00:08:51,680 of these objects and so then you tend to 245 00:08:54,870 --> 00:08:54,080 end up with many small sort of lunar 246 00:08:57,670 --> 00:08:54,880 mass 247 00:08:59,750 --> 00:08:57,680 uh planets that are orbiting uh and and 248 00:09:01,269 --> 00:08:59,760 you don't build up as large a planet you 249 00:09:04,150 --> 00:09:01,279 sort of have a lot of 250 00:09:06,790 --> 00:09:04,160 moon size things that are orbiting 251 00:09:08,550 --> 00:09:06,800 so the presence of gas uh in this for 252 00:09:11,110 --> 00:09:08,560 tens of millions of years 253 00:09:13,670 --> 00:09:11,120 a small amount of gas is is can make a 254 00:09:17,190 --> 00:09:13,680 big difference in forming uh uh 255 00:09:20,870 --> 00:09:19,269 now as i say one approach to this is 256 00:09:22,389 --> 00:09:20,880 just to look at things observationally 257 00:09:24,550 --> 00:09:22,399 and this talk's going to talk about the 258 00:09:26,150 --> 00:09:24,560 theoretical underpinning of trying to 259 00:09:28,949 --> 00:09:26,160 explain these observations but here's 260 00:09:29,910 --> 00:09:28,959 what we know in brief observationally is 261 00:09:34,070 --> 00:09:29,920 that 262 00:09:36,949 --> 00:09:34,080 about a tenth of the met of the mass of 263 00:09:39,030 --> 00:09:36,959 the star that they're orbiting and 264 00:09:41,590 --> 00:09:39,040 in the if we look at very young stars 265 00:09:43,269 --> 00:09:41,600 about 50 to 100 percent of them 266 00:09:44,550 --> 00:09:43,279 initially do have discs so that 267 00:09:46,389 --> 00:09:44,560 apparently they collapse with enough 268 00:09:48,230 --> 00:09:46,399 angular momentum to form disks often 269 00:09:50,389 --> 00:09:48,240 this often happens 270 00:09:52,230 --> 00:09:50,399 now if we look at stars old that are 271 00:09:54,070 --> 00:09:52,240 older and older as we look at stars that 272 00:09:55,829 --> 00:09:54,080 are 2 million years 3 million 4 or 5 273 00:09:58,150 --> 00:09:55,839 million years old what we see is that 274 00:10:00,710 --> 00:09:58,160 the dust in them disappears 275 00:10:02,790 --> 00:10:00,720 this dust that initially is sort of 276 00:10:04,150 --> 00:10:02,800 small particles and it's very opaque 277 00:10:05,910 --> 00:10:04,160 because you've got a lot of surface area 278 00:10:07,590 --> 00:10:05,920 in these small particles 279 00:10:09,030 --> 00:10:07,600 and so it's like a big 280 00:10:10,949 --> 00:10:09,040 opaque cloud 281 00:10:12,710 --> 00:10:10,959 and they become optically thin meaning 282 00:10:14,150 --> 00:10:12,720 you can see right through the disk in a 283 00:10:15,910 --> 00:10:14,160 few million years 284 00:10:17,110 --> 00:10:15,920 the stellar photons can go right through 285 00:10:18,550 --> 00:10:17,120 the disk 286 00:10:19,910 --> 00:10:18,560 and that only happens in a few million 287 00:10:22,150 --> 00:10:19,920 years so something's happening to the 288 00:10:23,990 --> 00:10:22,160 dust very rapidly in the inner disc and 289 00:10:26,069 --> 00:10:24,000 similarly in the outer disc we can 290 00:10:29,269 --> 00:10:26,079 measure actually the sub-millimeter 291 00:10:31,350 --> 00:10:29,279 radiation that this cold dust emits 292 00:10:33,670 --> 00:10:31,360 out there and see that it's diminishing 293 00:10:36,150 --> 00:10:33,680 in mass as well and about the same time 294 00:10:37,990 --> 00:10:36,160 scale so the dust is going away and by 295 00:10:39,110 --> 00:10:38,000 that i mean particles smaller than a 296 00:10:41,509 --> 00:10:39,120 millimeter 297 00:10:43,750 --> 00:10:41,519 now it could be that one way that's 298 00:10:45,829 --> 00:10:43,760 going away is that it's forming planets 299 00:10:47,509 --> 00:10:45,839 and if you form a planet you become 300 00:10:49,430 --> 00:10:47,519 optically thin because even though the 301 00:10:51,190 --> 00:10:49,440 planet you can't see through there's all 302 00:10:53,829 --> 00:10:51,200 this space between the planets that's 303 00:10:56,389 --> 00:10:53,839 just completely transparent and the disc 304 00:10:57,670 --> 00:10:56,399 becomes thin 305 00:11:00,310 --> 00:10:57,680 but there are other ways to get rid of 306 00:11:02,069 --> 00:11:00,320 the dust too which i'll be describing 307 00:11:03,910 --> 00:11:02,079 now there are some cases where we see a 308 00:11:05,350 --> 00:11:03,920 hole in the center of that it's 309 00:11:07,030 --> 00:11:05,360 optically thin you can see right through 310 00:11:09,430 --> 00:11:07,040 the inner part of the disc but with an 311 00:11:10,790 --> 00:11:09,440 optically thick outer disc 312 00:11:12,949 --> 00:11:10,800 one of the things that we're beginning 313 00:11:14,870 --> 00:11:12,959 to see just observationally with these 314 00:11:16,870 --> 00:11:14,880 uh radial velocity measurements of 315 00:11:17,910 --> 00:11:16,880 planets around the uh 316 00:11:20,790 --> 00:11:17,920 stars 317 00:11:22,630 --> 00:11:20,800 is that this initial mass which is a 318 00:11:23,509 --> 00:11:22,640 tenth of the solar mass or the stellar 319 00:11:25,190 --> 00:11:23,519 mass 320 00:11:26,630 --> 00:11:25,200 doesn't all go into planets because you 321 00:11:28,150 --> 00:11:26,640 add up the mass of planets that we're 322 00:11:29,269 --> 00:11:28,160 detecting and they tend to be 10 to the 323 00:11:31,030 --> 00:11:29,279 minus three 324 00:11:33,350 --> 00:11:31,040 solar masses that's true in our solar 325 00:11:35,110 --> 00:11:33,360 system as well so most of this mass 326 00:11:36,949 --> 00:11:35,120 doesn't go into planets it gets 327 00:11:38,710 --> 00:11:36,959 dispersed somehow it either goes onto 328 00:11:40,630 --> 00:11:38,720 the star or it goes out back out to 329 00:11:42,550 --> 00:11:40,640 space 330 00:11:45,269 --> 00:11:42,560 now the radial velocity observation 331 00:11:47,110 --> 00:11:45,279 suggests uh that at least 10 percent of 332 00:11:49,269 --> 00:11:47,120 stars form planets they're just done the 333 00:11:50,790 --> 00:11:49,279 statistics on the ones they've looked at 334 00:11:52,470 --> 00:11:50,800 and of course they they don't quite know 335 00:11:54,310 --> 00:11:52,480 how to extrapolate to systems that they 336 00:11:56,630 --> 00:11:54,320 can't see but might have planets so it's 337 00:11:58,630 --> 00:11:56,640 at least 10 percent uh so it could be 338 00:12:00,710 --> 00:11:58,640 that every star that has a disc forms 339 00:12:03,269 --> 00:12:00,720 some sort of planetary system or it 340 00:12:05,910 --> 00:12:03,279 could be that maybe of the stars that 341 00:12:07,750 --> 00:12:05,920 initially had discs maybe 50 of them 342 00:12:10,069 --> 00:12:07,760 never formed planets or something like 343 00:12:12,629 --> 00:12:10,079 that and the other because they the this 344 00:12:14,389 --> 00:12:12,639 dispersed too rapidly person 345 00:12:17,509 --> 00:12:14,399 so we'll talk a little bit about things 346 00:12:19,190 --> 00:12:17,519 that compete with planet formation 347 00:12:21,670 --> 00:12:19,200 again to give you a little more detail 348 00:12:23,829 --> 00:12:21,680 on how uh planets form here is this 349 00:12:25,590 --> 00:12:23,839 early stage where the cloud is falling 350 00:12:27,350 --> 00:12:25,600 onto the disk and one of the things 351 00:12:30,069 --> 00:12:27,360 theoretically we think may happen is 352 00:12:32,069 --> 00:12:30,079 that the disk builds up mass most of the 353 00:12:34,790 --> 00:12:32,079 material from the molecular cloud falls 354 00:12:36,710 --> 00:12:34,800 onto the disk not directly onto the star 355 00:12:38,389 --> 00:12:36,720 and the disk may build up mass until it 356 00:12:41,110 --> 00:12:38,399 gets to be about a tenth of the mass of 357 00:12:43,670 --> 00:12:41,120 the central star and then it becomes 358 00:12:44,870 --> 00:12:43,680 gravitationally unstable and this then 359 00:12:46,870 --> 00:12:44,880 leads to 360 00:12:49,269 --> 00:12:46,880 spiral waves and things that happen in 361 00:12:50,710 --> 00:12:49,279 the disc that allow angular momentum to 362 00:12:52,470 --> 00:12:50,720 be spread 363 00:12:54,629 --> 00:12:52,480 and what that happens when that happens 364 00:12:56,949 --> 00:12:54,639 material spirals onto the star from the 365 00:12:59,190 --> 00:12:56,959 outside in and material starts accreting 366 00:13:01,110 --> 00:12:59,200 onto the star as rapidly as material 367 00:13:03,190 --> 00:13:01,120 falls onto the disc material is agreeing 368 00:13:05,430 --> 00:13:03,200 on the star and it also causes the 369 00:13:08,069 --> 00:13:05,440 spreading of the disc and in these early 370 00:13:09,990 --> 00:13:08,079 stages the info is so opaque that the 371 00:13:12,389 --> 00:13:10,000 effects of radiation from the star on 372 00:13:14,629 --> 00:13:12,399 the disc are nil because it's the the 373 00:13:17,110 --> 00:13:14,639 info is keeping that radiation from the 374 00:13:21,509 --> 00:13:19,509 if we now look at a later stage when the 375 00:13:23,829 --> 00:13:21,519 collapse has stopped which is after 376 00:13:25,750 --> 00:13:23,839 perhaps a few ten of the fifth years 377 00:13:28,150 --> 00:13:25,760 and there's no more not much material 378 00:13:29,829 --> 00:13:28,160 flowing onto the disc from the cloud 379 00:13:32,069 --> 00:13:29,839 then you get this situation which is 380 00:13:33,430 --> 00:13:32,079 more likely that the place where planets 381 00:13:35,430 --> 00:13:33,440 form i should have mentioned that in 382 00:13:37,190 --> 00:13:35,440 that early stage when you have this very 383 00:13:39,110 --> 00:13:37,200 vigorous accretion of material any 384 00:13:40,710 --> 00:13:39,120 planets that could form that rapidly 385 00:13:42,230 --> 00:13:40,720 would probably be swept right into the 386 00:13:43,670 --> 00:13:42,240 central star 387 00:13:45,430 --> 00:13:43,680 and and 388 00:13:47,269 --> 00:13:45,440 whereas it's these later stages where 389 00:13:49,350 --> 00:13:47,279 the disc mass gets less than a tenth of 390 00:13:51,829 --> 00:13:49,360 the mass of the star that the planets 391 00:13:53,670 --> 00:13:51,839 that form may survive and orbit you know 392 00:13:55,350 --> 00:13:53,680 for billions of years 393 00:13:57,269 --> 00:13:55,360 uh and in this stage 394 00:13:58,949 --> 00:13:57,279 you still have accretion onto the star 395 00:14:01,509 --> 00:13:58,959 but it's at a much lower rate and it's 396 00:14:05,269 --> 00:14:01,519 driven by turbulent viscosity 397 00:14:07,910 --> 00:14:05,279 and with this mri is something that's a 398 00:14:09,670 --> 00:14:07,920 magnetic rotational instability which is 399 00:14:11,350 --> 00:14:09,680 sometimes thought to drive this 400 00:14:13,750 --> 00:14:11,360 turbulence which then leads to this 401 00:14:15,990 --> 00:14:13,760 spread of angular momentum 402 00:14:17,990 --> 00:14:16,000 and that leads to accretion out of the 403 00:14:19,509 --> 00:14:18,000 disk of this and so the disk mass then 404 00:14:21,350 --> 00:14:19,519 starts to drop from the tenth of the 405 00:14:24,069 --> 00:14:21,360 massive star to lower and lower values 406 00:14:25,750 --> 00:14:24,079 as material accretes onto the star but 407 00:14:27,509 --> 00:14:25,760 at the same time what the reason the 408 00:14:29,110 --> 00:14:27,519 mass of the disk is is dropping is that 409 00:14:32,470 --> 00:14:29,120 there are evaporation or there are 410 00:14:34,629 --> 00:14:32,480 dispersal mechanisms that are going on 411 00:14:37,350 --> 00:14:34,639 and there are several that are important 412 00:14:39,269 --> 00:14:37,360 one is that the ultraviolet radiation 413 00:14:40,710 --> 00:14:39,279 and the x-rays from the central star 414 00:14:43,189 --> 00:14:40,720 shine on the surface of the disk and 415 00:14:45,269 --> 00:14:43,199 they heat the surface up and that drives 416 00:14:47,430 --> 00:14:45,279 photo evaporation of the outer parts of 417 00:14:49,750 --> 00:14:47,440 the disc the disc is thermally hot the 418 00:14:52,790 --> 00:14:49,760 thermal pressure drives it out to uh 419 00:14:54,150 --> 00:14:52,800 interstellar space and it evaporates 420 00:14:56,470 --> 00:14:54,160 the other thing that can happen is that 421 00:14:58,230 --> 00:14:56,480 the wind from the central star can hit 422 00:15:00,310 --> 00:14:58,240 the surface of the disc and just entrain 423 00:15:01,910 --> 00:15:00,320 material and just drive it out uh to the 424 00:15:04,470 --> 00:15:01,920 interstellar space and and and so 425 00:15:07,189 --> 00:15:04,480 material is entrained and driven out uh 426 00:15:08,949 --> 00:15:07,199 and and lost uh from the disc 427 00:15:11,430 --> 00:15:08,959 uh and i'll talk about another one which 428 00:15:14,310 --> 00:15:11,440 is a stellar encounters in just a minute 429 00:15:16,230 --> 00:15:14,320 but this this whole process of planets 430 00:15:18,790 --> 00:15:16,240 forming the material accreting onto the 431 00:15:20,389 --> 00:15:18,800 star and and dispersal mechanisms 432 00:15:22,470 --> 00:15:20,399 happening occurs over periods of 433 00:15:25,189 --> 00:15:22,480 millions of years and there's a very 434 00:15:27,590 --> 00:15:25,199 intense composition competition going on 435 00:15:29,829 --> 00:15:27,600 between the planets trying to form but 436 00:15:31,990 --> 00:15:29,839 this dispersal happening simultaneously 437 00:15:35,670 --> 00:15:32,000 trying to try in a way trying to stop 438 00:15:39,750 --> 00:15:38,150 so the effects of gas dispersal on the 439 00:15:42,310 --> 00:15:39,760 plant formation and by gas dispersal 440 00:15:43,990 --> 00:15:42,320 it's not only the gas but the gas when 441 00:15:46,389 --> 00:15:44,000 when the gas is dispersed it actually 442 00:15:47,750 --> 00:15:46,399 pulls with it the dust that is small 443 00:15:49,269 --> 00:15:47,760 everything less than a millimeter in 444 00:15:51,350 --> 00:15:49,279 size and dust particles kind of goes 445 00:15:53,590 --> 00:15:51,360 with the gas but the bigger stuff can 446 00:15:55,910 --> 00:15:53,600 stay behind because the gas just passes 447 00:15:57,990 --> 00:15:55,920 over it they're like cannon balls that 448 00:15:59,110 --> 00:15:58,000 don't get affected and still orbit the 449 00:16:00,470 --> 00:15:59,120 star 450 00:16:02,389 --> 00:16:00,480 so the first thing that can happen is 451 00:16:04,150 --> 00:16:02,399 that it can affect the formation of gas 452 00:16:06,069 --> 00:16:04,160 giant planets because if you get rid of 453 00:16:08,470 --> 00:16:06,079 the gas too quickly there's no gas for 454 00:16:10,870 --> 00:16:08,480 those cores to attract 455 00:16:12,949 --> 00:16:10,880 like to form jupiters 456 00:16:14,790 --> 00:16:12,959 but secondly the gas effects as i've 457 00:16:16,870 --> 00:16:14,800 mentioned the eccentricity and size of 458 00:16:18,629 --> 00:16:16,880 terrestrial planets and it also affects 459 00:16:21,110 --> 00:16:18,639 planet migration this 460 00:16:22,949 --> 00:16:21,120 the gas the planet pulls on the gas and 461 00:16:25,030 --> 00:16:22,959 the gas pulls on the planet and the net 462 00:16:26,629 --> 00:16:25,040 effect is a kind of a friction on the 463 00:16:28,949 --> 00:16:26,639 planets and so that can cause them to 464 00:16:31,269 --> 00:16:28,959 actually spiral into the star and they 465 00:16:33,269 --> 00:16:31,279 move around it's called planet migration 466 00:16:34,870 --> 00:16:33,279 and it affects the eccentricity of the 467 00:16:37,590 --> 00:16:34,880 planets as well how elliptical their 468 00:16:39,590 --> 00:16:37,600 orbits are 469 00:16:41,269 --> 00:16:39,600 in addition uh it turns out that 470 00:16:43,269 --> 00:16:41,279 different mass stars are going to 471 00:16:45,670 --> 00:16:43,279 evaporate or disperse their discs in 472 00:16:47,430 --> 00:16:45,680 different time scales and some of the 473 00:16:49,590 --> 00:16:47,440 more massive stars for example as i'll 474 00:16:51,030 --> 00:16:49,600 show you disperse them very rapidly and 475 00:16:53,509 --> 00:16:51,040 so there won't be time enough for 476 00:16:54,710 --> 00:16:53,519 planets to form around very high mass 477 00:16:57,189 --> 00:16:54,720 stars 478 00:16:59,189 --> 00:16:57,199 and finally because that some of these 479 00:17:01,110 --> 00:16:59,199 dispersal mechanisms are getting rid of 480 00:17:03,269 --> 00:17:01,120 the material in the outer parts of the 481 00:17:05,270 --> 00:17:03,279 disk where water and volatile rich 482 00:17:07,750 --> 00:17:05,280 objects form like comets 483 00:17:09,510 --> 00:17:07,760 it may affect the formation of these 484 00:17:13,909 --> 00:17:09,520 things that may be reservoirs for 485 00:17:16,309 --> 00:17:13,919 volatiles and water-rich materials 486 00:17:17,829 --> 00:17:16,319 so the outline of the talk is to 487 00:17:19,669 --> 00:17:17,839 look at these various dispersal 488 00:17:21,270 --> 00:17:19,679 mechanisms the viscous evolution that 489 00:17:23,110 --> 00:17:21,280 makes things spiral under the star 490 00:17:25,350 --> 00:17:23,120 stellar encounters we'll talk about 491 00:17:27,029 --> 00:17:25,360 stripping by winds and photo evaporation 492 00:17:29,750 --> 00:17:27,039 i'm going to show you that viscous 493 00:17:31,029 --> 00:17:29,760 evolution and photo evaporation probably 494 00:17:33,029 --> 00:17:31,039 dominate 495 00:17:34,470 --> 00:17:33,039 these dispersal mechanisms and then 496 00:17:35,990 --> 00:17:34,480 we'll put the two together the two 497 00:17:38,230 --> 00:17:36,000 important ones viscous evolution and 498 00:17:40,470 --> 00:17:38,240 photo evaporation and see what the 499 00:17:44,070 --> 00:17:40,480 evolution of the disc will be with those 500 00:17:47,990 --> 00:17:46,070 so the viscous spreading as i mentioned 501 00:17:50,310 --> 00:17:48,000 is this sort of friction because the 502 00:17:52,150 --> 00:17:50,320 inner gas is orbiting faster than the 503 00:17:54,470 --> 00:17:52,160 outer gas and if there's any kind of 504 00:17:56,470 --> 00:17:54,480 friction then the outer gas kind of rubs 505 00:17:58,390 --> 00:17:56,480 against the inner gas makes it slow down 506 00:18:00,789 --> 00:17:58,400 and then it spirals into the star and 507 00:18:03,669 --> 00:18:00,799 you get this spiraling in uh to the star 508 00:18:05,909 --> 00:18:03,679 where uh so the the secretion tends to 509 00:18:07,909 --> 00:18:05,919 spread the disc this small amount of 510 00:18:10,310 --> 00:18:07,919 material gets more angular momentum and 511 00:18:13,990 --> 00:18:10,320 goes out but most of it is being 512 00:18:16,630 --> 00:18:14,000 spiraling in onto the star 513 00:18:19,029 --> 00:18:16,640 and we do the calculations uh of this 514 00:18:21,669 --> 00:18:19,039 turbulent viscous evolution 515 00:18:23,750 --> 00:18:21,679 we use a a dimensionless parameter to 516 00:18:26,630 --> 00:18:23,760 sort of hide our uncertainties in 517 00:18:29,190 --> 00:18:26,640 processes called alpha and astronomers 518 00:18:31,909 --> 00:18:29,200 talk about alpha disc evolution alpha 519 00:18:33,430 --> 00:18:31,919 then measures how much of this viscosity 520 00:18:34,789 --> 00:18:33,440 is present in the disc 521 00:18:37,190 --> 00:18:34,799 uh and 522 00:18:39,270 --> 00:18:37,200 we kind of know what the value of alpha 523 00:18:40,950 --> 00:18:39,280 is just by observational constraints we 524 00:18:42,549 --> 00:18:40,960 see how fast discs are accreting on 525 00:18:44,150 --> 00:18:42,559 their stars and we can kind of back up 526 00:18:46,390 --> 00:18:44,160 and see how viscous it had to be in 527 00:18:48,070 --> 00:18:46,400 order for it to viscously evolve but we 528 00:18:50,950 --> 00:18:48,080 also have theoretical models of this 529 00:18:52,789 --> 00:18:50,960 magneto rotational instability which 530 00:18:54,950 --> 00:18:52,799 people have done very detailed numerical 531 00:18:57,270 --> 00:18:54,960 models of this evolution and and found 532 00:18:57,990 --> 00:18:57,280 that alpha's of this order as well 533 00:19:00,310 --> 00:18:58,000 uh 534 00:19:02,549 --> 00:19:00,320 and the way a viscous evolution works is 535 00:19:04,470 --> 00:19:02,559 that the time scales are much shorter in 536 00:19:06,870 --> 00:19:04,480 the inner parts of the disk i've plotted 537 00:19:08,950 --> 00:19:06,880 time scales versus how far out in the 538 00:19:11,510 --> 00:19:08,960 disk you are what radius out in the disk 539 00:19:13,990 --> 00:19:11,520 you are in astronomical units so one is 540 00:19:15,110 --> 00:19:14,000 the earth 541 00:19:17,590 --> 00:19:15,120 um 542 00:19:20,310 --> 00:19:17,600 so this time scale is defined as follows 543 00:19:22,630 --> 00:19:20,320 it's the surface density sigma of the 544 00:19:24,710 --> 00:19:22,640 disk at that radius divided by how 545 00:19:26,710 --> 00:19:24,720 rapidly that surface density is changing 546 00:19:29,669 --> 00:19:26,720 in time due to this 547 00:19:31,830 --> 00:19:29,679 spreading and this accretion inward 548 00:19:34,470 --> 00:19:31,840 so when i say that if you have alpha of 549 00:19:36,470 --> 00:19:34,480 10 to the minus 3 here at 1au 550 00:19:39,430 --> 00:19:36,480 you find that the time scale is about 10 551 00:19:41,350 --> 00:19:39,440 to the 5th years now that means what 552 00:19:44,630 --> 00:19:41,360 that really means is that that material 553 00:19:46,789 --> 00:19:44,640 at at one a u spirals into like a half 554 00:19:48,310 --> 00:19:46,799 of an au in that time scale of ten to 555 00:19:51,430 --> 00:19:48,320 the fifth years that's a time scale to 556 00:19:53,110 --> 00:19:51,440 move a significant distance inward 557 00:19:55,430 --> 00:19:53,120 but it doesn't mean that that material 558 00:19:57,350 --> 00:19:55,440 disappears at 1au in 10 to the 5th years 559 00:19:58,630 --> 00:19:57,360 because what happens if you viscously 560 00:20:01,110 --> 00:19:58,640 evolve this 561 00:20:04,310 --> 00:20:01,120 is that most of the mass is contained 562 00:20:06,549 --> 00:20:04,320 further out in the disk at say 100 au 563 00:20:08,390 --> 00:20:06,559 and this material where most of the mass 564 00:20:11,190 --> 00:20:08,400 is replenishes the material that's 565 00:20:12,789 --> 00:20:11,200 inside of it so as as this material 566 00:20:14,150 --> 00:20:12,799 rapidly goes in 567 00:20:15,909 --> 00:20:14,160 that's a small amount of mass that 568 00:20:17,430 --> 00:20:15,919 rapidly goes in you've got a lot of mass 569 00:20:20,070 --> 00:20:17,440 here which the time scales are longer 570 00:20:22,390 --> 00:20:20,080 but the mass flux inward is enough to 571 00:20:23,750 --> 00:20:22,400 replace it because you've got a big mass 572 00:20:25,270 --> 00:20:23,760 even though the time scales are longer 573 00:20:27,590 --> 00:20:25,280 the m-dot 574 00:20:29,909 --> 00:20:27,600 replaces it so what happens is that the 575 00:20:31,430 --> 00:20:29,919 discs viscously do last longer than 10 576 00:20:33,590 --> 00:20:31,440 of the fifth years at one of you because 577 00:20:36,390 --> 00:20:33,600 of the longer time scales for the 578 00:20:37,909 --> 00:20:36,400 material outward to go in it also means 579 00:20:39,590 --> 00:20:37,919 that what determines the lifetime of 580 00:20:42,070 --> 00:20:39,600 discs that are just viscously evolving 581 00:20:43,830 --> 00:20:42,080 is sort of the the the time scale out at 582 00:20:45,990 --> 00:20:43,840 the distance where most of the mass is 583 00:20:47,190 --> 00:20:46,000 which might be at 100 a year 584 00:20:48,950 --> 00:20:47,200 well i've kind of beaten that one to 585 00:20:51,510 --> 00:20:48,960 death um 586 00:20:53,190 --> 00:20:51,520 so let's look at so i'm gonna by the way 587 00:20:55,270 --> 00:20:53,200 uh you you see this you say well that's 588 00:20:56,789 --> 00:20:55,280 that's a nice graph but um 589 00:20:58,070 --> 00:20:56,799 i'm gonna show other graphs of all these 590 00:20:59,270 --> 00:20:58,080 different mechanisms which will have 591 00:21:00,870 --> 00:20:59,280 time scales and then we'll be able to 592 00:21:02,870 --> 00:21:00,880 compare them and see which ones are the 593 00:21:04,390 --> 00:21:02,880 most important so that remember sort of 594 00:21:06,710 --> 00:21:04,400 try to remember that one but we'll i'll 595 00:21:09,029 --> 00:21:06,720 show it to you again later 596 00:21:10,549 --> 00:21:09,039 so here's the other thing about stars 597 00:21:11,830 --> 00:21:10,559 forming is that they tend to form in 598 00:21:14,870 --> 00:21:11,840 clusters 599 00:21:16,710 --> 00:21:14,880 and so uh in fact we see some star 600 00:21:19,190 --> 00:21:16,720 clusters where there are a thousand or 601 00:21:21,909 --> 00:21:19,200 ten thousand stars within a light year 602 00:21:23,750 --> 00:21:21,919 of each other and that's i mean here at 603 00:21:25,830 --> 00:21:23,760 the sun right now we've our nearest star 604 00:21:27,669 --> 00:21:25,840 is a few light years from us so uh we're 605 00:21:29,270 --> 00:21:27,679 talking about much denser than the stars 606 00:21:30,549 --> 00:21:29,280 here and so if we were born in that 607 00:21:33,029 --> 00:21:30,559 system we would see a lot of bright 608 00:21:34,230 --> 00:21:33,039 stars out in the sky uh very bright 609 00:21:36,390 --> 00:21:34,240 stars 610 00:21:38,310 --> 00:21:36,400 um and they uh 611 00:21:39,270 --> 00:21:38,320 they tend to have these densities then 612 00:21:40,870 --> 00:21:39,280 of uh 613 00:21:42,710 --> 00:21:40,880 they can have densities up to 10 to the 614 00:21:45,590 --> 00:21:42,720 fourth per cubic parsec which is about 615 00:21:47,510 --> 00:21:45,600 per cubic light year more or less 616 00:21:49,270 --> 00:21:47,520 so you can calculate the close 617 00:21:50,470 --> 00:21:49,280 encounters that these stars will have 618 00:21:52,070 --> 00:21:50,480 with each other 619 00:21:54,630 --> 00:21:52,080 and when they make a close encounter the 620 00:21:56,310 --> 00:21:54,640 disc around one of the stars is going to 621 00:21:57,750 --> 00:21:56,320 can get truncated 622 00:21:59,750 --> 00:21:57,760 for example i show this picture here 623 00:22:00,950 --> 00:21:59,760 here's a star going by a star and disc 624 00:22:02,950 --> 00:22:00,960 system 625 00:22:05,110 --> 00:22:02,960 and what happens when you make an 626 00:22:07,510 --> 00:22:05,120 encounter is that you strip the material 627 00:22:10,230 --> 00:22:07,520 away to about one third of the distance 628 00:22:11,909 --> 00:22:10,240 of the closest approach of that star 629 00:22:13,909 --> 00:22:11,919 so if the disc is bigger than that it 630 00:22:16,310 --> 00:22:13,919 will just be stripped down to that size 631 00:22:18,230 --> 00:22:16,320 of about one-third the closest approach 632 00:22:20,710 --> 00:22:18,240 by that encounter 633 00:22:22,470 --> 00:22:20,720 so if you want to start stripping 634 00:22:25,190 --> 00:22:22,480 discs that are hundreds of au you need 635 00:22:39,110 --> 00:22:25,200 encounters that occur that close of 400 636 00:22:39,120 --> 00:22:41,750 which i'll available 637 00:22:45,190 --> 00:22:43,350 here's the time scales now this is in 638 00:22:47,430 --> 00:22:45,200 the one of the densest clusters that we 639 00:22:49,909 --> 00:22:47,440 know about a very dense cluster like the 640 00:22:51,909 --> 00:22:49,919 trapezium cluster in orion where we have 641 00:22:54,870 --> 00:22:51,919 this sort of 10 to the four stars per 642 00:22:56,710 --> 00:22:54,880 cubic light year and you see that if the 643 00:22:58,149 --> 00:22:56,720 discs are big the time scales are very 644 00:22:59,510 --> 00:22:58,159 short because 645 00:23:02,310 --> 00:22:59,520 you do have a lot of collisions that 646 00:23:03,990 --> 00:23:02,320 occur within a thousand au of a disc 647 00:23:05,590 --> 00:23:04,000 but if the disc gets small the time 648 00:23:07,669 --> 00:23:05,600 scales get very long because you have to 649 00:23:09,270 --> 00:23:07,679 get really close encounters in order to 650 00:23:15,029 --> 00:23:09,280 strip those discs smaller and to make 651 00:23:18,950 --> 00:23:17,190 now we'll move to another mechanism for 652 00:23:21,350 --> 00:23:18,960 dispersal which is stripping by stellar 653 00:23:24,149 --> 00:23:21,360 winds which historically was if you ask 654 00:23:25,830 --> 00:23:24,159 people what dispersed the solar nebula 655 00:23:27,510 --> 00:23:25,840 people would have said it was the wind 656 00:23:29,029 --> 00:23:27,520 from the start from the sun that 657 00:23:30,870 --> 00:23:29,039 eventually you know just blew away the 658 00:23:32,470 --> 00:23:30,880 gas that because we knew that not all 659 00:23:34,549 --> 00:23:32,480 the hydrogen went into jupiter we could 660 00:23:35,750 --> 00:23:34,559 tell from from looking at the metal 661 00:23:37,669 --> 00:23:35,760 content of jupiter that there was 662 00:23:39,190 --> 00:23:37,679 hydrogen missing and so we said well 663 00:23:41,029 --> 00:23:39,200 that hydrogen just got blown away by the 664 00:23:43,990 --> 00:23:41,039 stellar wind well that turns out 665 00:23:46,070 --> 00:23:44,000 probably not correct uh that 666 00:23:47,430 --> 00:23:46,080 we've done some more recent calculations 667 00:23:49,669 --> 00:23:47,440 of this 668 00:23:51,669 --> 00:23:49,679 stripping by stellar winds the situation 669 00:23:53,430 --> 00:23:51,679 is that you have a disc like this and 670 00:23:56,310 --> 00:23:53,440 you have a wind impacting it at a very 671 00:23:58,070 --> 00:23:56,320 glancing angle and it it impacts on the 672 00:23:59,909 --> 00:23:58,080 surface and it creates a sheer layer on 673 00:24:01,669 --> 00:23:59,919 the surface which material gets sort of 674 00:24:04,070 --> 00:24:01,679 entrained and driven out into the 675 00:24:06,390 --> 00:24:04,080 interstellar space and you can calculate 676 00:24:08,070 --> 00:24:06,400 the mass loss rate in the disk by 677 00:24:10,149 --> 00:24:08,080 basically taking the area and then 678 00:24:12,070 --> 00:24:10,159 multiplying by a flux 679 00:24:14,070 --> 00:24:12,080 this is the density of the gas times its 680 00:24:16,310 --> 00:24:14,080 sound speed times an efficiency factor 681 00:24:17,909 --> 00:24:16,320 sort of a flux of material from the disk 682 00:24:20,549 --> 00:24:17,919 going up into that mixing layer and then 683 00:24:21,909 --> 00:24:20,559 being carried out uh into interstellar 684 00:24:24,710 --> 00:24:21,919 space 685 00:24:26,549 --> 00:24:24,720 and in doing such a calculation we found 686 00:24:28,470 --> 00:24:26,559 our group has found that 687 00:24:31,350 --> 00:24:28,480 these are the time scales for around a 688 00:24:33,350 --> 00:24:31,360 one solar mass star with a typical wind 689 00:24:35,269 --> 00:24:33,360 that's about as strong as the early 690 00:24:36,789 --> 00:24:35,279 winds on the sun were 691 00:24:38,230 --> 00:24:36,799 and with a surface density that looks 692 00:24:41,590 --> 00:24:38,240 something like what we think the surface 693 00:24:43,990 --> 00:24:41,600 density of the sun looked like 694 00:24:45,750 --> 00:24:44,000 as a function of radius and we find that 695 00:24:47,909 --> 00:24:45,760 these time scales to get rid of the 696 00:24:49,990 --> 00:24:47,919 material at these different distances in 697 00:24:51,830 --> 00:24:50,000 the disk range from fairly short time 698 00:24:53,909 --> 00:24:51,840 scales on the inner part of the disk to 699 00:24:55,830 --> 00:24:53,919 fairly long time scales in the outer 700 00:24:57,029 --> 00:24:55,840 part of the disk and we will compare 701 00:24:59,669 --> 00:24:57,039 these time scales with the other 702 00:25:01,990 --> 00:24:59,679 mechanisms in a minute 703 00:25:03,990 --> 00:25:02,000 so now let's finally move to the final 704 00:25:05,990 --> 00:25:04,000 mechanism for dispersing these discs and 705 00:25:06,870 --> 00:25:06,000 that's photo evaporation which turns out 706 00:25:08,950 --> 00:25:06,880 to be 707 00:25:10,950 --> 00:25:08,960 the important one for the outer part of 708 00:25:12,070 --> 00:25:10,960 the disc 709 00:25:13,750 --> 00:25:12,080 so these are something that i've been 710 00:25:15,269 --> 00:25:13,760 working on for the last more than the 711 00:25:16,149 --> 00:25:15,279 last 10 years 712 00:25:16,950 --> 00:25:16,159 and they're 713 00:25:19,750 --> 00:25:16,960 pretty 714 00:25:22,310 --> 00:25:19,760 difficult models to get right 715 00:25:23,750 --> 00:25:22,320 it's it's a complicated process so 716 00:25:25,350 --> 00:25:23,760 let's just run through a few things 717 00:25:28,549 --> 00:25:25,360 elements that go into these computer 718 00:25:30,230 --> 00:25:28,559 codes our codes now take a week to run 719 00:25:33,269 --> 00:25:30,240 and the fastest machines we have a week 720 00:25:34,789 --> 00:25:33,279 to run one run of one particular disk at 721 00:25:36,630 --> 00:25:34,799 one instant of time 722 00:25:38,870 --> 00:25:36,640 and of course we try to evolve it with 723 00:25:40,310 --> 00:25:38,880 time it takes forever and so we're 724 00:25:42,789 --> 00:25:40,320 really running into some serious 725 00:25:45,350 --> 00:25:42,799 computational problems but so here's a 726 00:25:48,149 --> 00:25:45,360 situation you've got the central star 727 00:25:49,830 --> 00:25:48,159 irradiating this disc the disc gas 728 00:25:51,830 --> 00:25:49,840 temperature does not necessarily equal a 729 00:25:54,230 --> 00:25:51,840 dust temperature and i will show you 730 00:25:56,149 --> 00:25:54,240 some results from our code where that's 731 00:25:57,590 --> 00:25:56,159 we show that to be true in the mid plane 732 00:25:59,350 --> 00:25:57,600 it is true that the gas temperature 733 00:26:01,909 --> 00:25:59,360 equals the dust temperature but as you 734 00:26:03,190 --> 00:26:01,919 go up in the disk the gas 735 00:26:05,669 --> 00:26:03,200 because it has different heating and 736 00:26:07,750 --> 00:26:05,679 cooling mechanisms up high and can and 737 00:26:09,269 --> 00:26:07,760 can radiate to space and dust radiates 738 00:26:11,029 --> 00:26:09,279 the space even more efficiently the gas 739 00:26:12,390 --> 00:26:11,039 tends to get hotter than the dust up 740 00:26:15,909 --> 00:26:12,400 near the surface 741 00:26:18,149 --> 00:26:15,919 due to the heating by x-rays and uv 742 00:26:19,990 --> 00:26:18,159 what we have to do is a self-consistent 743 00:26:21,590 --> 00:26:20,000 solution in the disc of its chemistry 744 00:26:23,029 --> 00:26:21,600 because this chemistry determines its 745 00:26:24,789 --> 00:26:23,039 heating and cooling so we got to do the 746 00:26:26,230 --> 00:26:24,799 chemistry then we have to do the heating 747 00:26:28,549 --> 00:26:26,240 and cooling we have to do the radio 748 00:26:30,710 --> 00:26:28,559 transfer of how the photons escape from 749 00:26:32,549 --> 00:26:30,720 the disc because uh they tend to be 750 00:26:34,710 --> 00:26:32,559 optically thick and they self-absorb and 751 00:26:36,230 --> 00:26:34,720 they eventually sort of percolate out 752 00:26:38,870 --> 00:26:36,240 um 753 00:26:40,950 --> 00:26:38,880 and it's and then the vertical structure 754 00:26:42,149 --> 00:26:40,960 of the disc is determined by the gas 755 00:26:44,149 --> 00:26:42,159 temperature so you have to self 756 00:26:46,070 --> 00:26:44,159 consistently then if the gas is hotter 757 00:26:48,149 --> 00:26:46,080 it puffs up and if it's cooler it gets 758 00:26:50,070 --> 00:26:48,159 thinner uh you have to do everything 759 00:26:51,830 --> 00:26:50,080 simultaneously and then do the dynamics 760 00:26:54,230 --> 00:26:51,840 of the flow so we do make some 761 00:26:57,029 --> 00:26:54,240 approximations and already it's fairly 762 00:26:58,149 --> 00:26:57,039 complicated um 763 00:27:00,230 --> 00:26:58,159 so uh 764 00:27:01,830 --> 00:27:00,240 let me just i want to tell you one or 765 00:27:04,070 --> 00:27:01,840 two things about the physics of this 766 00:27:06,710 --> 00:27:04,080 photo evaporation just to get you sort 767 00:27:08,789 --> 00:27:06,720 of a better idea of what's going on 768 00:27:11,110 --> 00:27:08,799 so regardless of whether you've got uv 769 00:27:13,190 --> 00:27:11,120 photons from an external star shining on 770 00:27:15,830 --> 00:27:13,200 the disc here's a low mass star like the 771 00:27:18,310 --> 00:27:15,840 sun with a disc in this plane here 772 00:27:19,909 --> 00:27:18,320 that's what we're seeing an edge on 773 00:27:21,190 --> 00:27:19,919 you can either have external photons or 774 00:27:22,870 --> 00:27:21,200 you can have photons from the central 775 00:27:25,590 --> 00:27:22,880 star you get the same structure you get 776 00:27:28,310 --> 00:27:25,600 this inner part where you you this uv 777 00:27:30,310 --> 00:27:28,320 heating uh heats it up and it causes it 778 00:27:32,470 --> 00:27:30,320 to puff more and more as you go out in 779 00:27:33,990 --> 00:27:32,480 radius because gravity from the star is 780 00:27:35,909 --> 00:27:34,000 getting weaker and so it puffs up more 781 00:27:37,350 --> 00:27:35,919 and more the thermal pressure posted up 782 00:27:39,110 --> 00:27:37,360 eventually you get to the point where 783 00:27:41,430 --> 00:27:39,120 you have a flow out to the interstellar 784 00:27:43,990 --> 00:27:41,440 medium and that point turns out to be 785 00:27:46,390 --> 00:27:44,000 roughly where the thermal speed of the 786 00:27:48,470 --> 00:27:46,400 atoms is equal to the escape speed from 787 00:27:50,390 --> 00:27:48,480 this system the gravitational escape 788 00:27:52,789 --> 00:27:50,400 speed from the system 789 00:27:53,830 --> 00:27:52,799 now euv photons are those that ionize 790 00:27:56,149 --> 00:27:53,840 hydrogen 791 00:27:58,710 --> 00:27:56,159 and fuv photons are those that are not 792 00:28:00,789 --> 00:27:58,720 energetic enough to ionize hydrogen so 793 00:28:03,590 --> 00:28:00,799 it turns out that in terms of electron 794 00:28:06,870 --> 00:28:03,600 volts it takes 13.6 electron volts to 795 00:28:08,470 --> 00:28:06,880 ionize hydrogen atom so 796 00:28:10,630 --> 00:28:08,480 photons more energetic than that which 797 00:28:11,909 --> 00:28:10,640 are about 912 angstroms 798 00:28:15,909 --> 00:28:11,919 we'll 799 00:28:17,830 --> 00:28:15,919 will ionize the disc and these fue 800 00:28:19,350 --> 00:28:17,840 photons will not ionize it but they will 801 00:28:21,830 --> 00:28:19,360 heat it 802 00:28:24,230 --> 00:28:21,840 okay so there is this characteristic 803 00:28:25,590 --> 00:28:24,240 distance where you get the flow 804 00:28:28,310 --> 00:28:25,600 well first there's a characteristic 805 00:28:30,549 --> 00:28:28,320 distance let me say that rg that is 806 00:28:32,310 --> 00:28:30,559 defined as the place where the escape 807 00:28:33,750 --> 00:28:32,320 speed from the system which is given by 808 00:28:35,510 --> 00:28:33,760 this formula 809 00:28:37,669 --> 00:28:35,520 the mass of the star times gravitational 810 00:28:39,510 --> 00:28:37,679 constant over our g of the one half is 811 00:28:42,070 --> 00:28:39,520 equal to the thermal speed of the gas 812 00:28:44,630 --> 00:28:42,080 atom c 813 00:28:47,510 --> 00:28:44,640 that defines rg it turns out that if you 814 00:28:49,990 --> 00:28:47,520 actually do the details of the flow 815 00:28:52,389 --> 00:28:50,000 that you do get significant evaporation 816 00:28:54,950 --> 00:28:52,399 even inside rg down to about two-tenths 817 00:28:56,230 --> 00:28:54,960 of rg so the critical distance where you 818 00:28:58,310 --> 00:28:56,240 get the flow 819 00:29:01,830 --> 00:28:58,320 uh is defined by rg but it's more like 820 00:29:04,149 --> 00:29:01,840 two tenths of rg and so for euv photons 821 00:29:07,110 --> 00:29:04,159 which heat the surface gas up to ten 822 00:29:08,789 --> 00:29:07,120 thousand degrees uh by ionizing hydrogen 823 00:29:10,710 --> 00:29:08,799 uh atoms 824 00:29:12,710 --> 00:29:10,720 that that critical distance is a few 825 00:29:15,750 --> 00:29:12,720 astronomical units 826 00:29:17,909 --> 00:29:15,760 but if you're at the fuv photons they 827 00:29:19,750 --> 00:29:17,919 they only heat up to a thousand degrees 828 00:29:22,630 --> 00:29:19,760 and so they're most of their mass loss 829 00:29:24,630 --> 00:29:22,640 is occurring beyond 38 830 00:29:26,789 --> 00:29:24,640 and there's another big difference is in 831 00:29:28,710 --> 00:29:26,799 that the e photons because of the radius 832 00:29:31,510 --> 00:29:28,720 of transfer tend to focus their 833 00:29:33,190 --> 00:29:31,520 evaporation right at this uh this 834 00:29:35,750 --> 00:29:33,200 critical radius so that they tend to try 835 00:29:38,630 --> 00:29:35,760 to burn a hole in the disk at 2au 836 00:29:41,029 --> 00:29:38,640 but the fuv photons tend to evaporate 837 00:29:42,389 --> 00:29:41,039 from the outside of the disk in 838 00:29:43,590 --> 00:29:42,399 so they evaporate the outside that is 839 00:29:48,310 --> 00:29:43,600 first and then they sort of work their 840 00:29:51,110 --> 00:29:49,590 okay so 841 00:29:53,430 --> 00:29:51,120 let's look first then at the photo 842 00:29:55,590 --> 00:29:53,440 evaporation by an external star in other 843 00:29:57,430 --> 00:29:55,600 words you have a low mass star with a 844 00:29:59,190 --> 00:29:57,440 disc around it at low mass meaning uh 845 00:30:00,870 --> 00:29:59,200 like the sun sun is considered a low 846 00:30:04,070 --> 00:30:00,880 mass star 847 00:30:06,310 --> 00:30:04,080 is considered like 10 times the mass of 848 00:30:08,710 --> 00:30:06,320 the sun or 30 times the mass of the sun 849 00:30:10,630 --> 00:30:08,720 and they're not as they're they're rarer 850 00:30:12,230 --> 00:30:10,640 but they are incredibly luminous in 851 00:30:15,110 --> 00:30:12,240 ultraviolet maybe a hundred thousand 852 00:30:17,510 --> 00:30:15,120 times as luminous as the sun uh in just 853 00:30:18,549 --> 00:30:17,520 in volumetric luminosity 854 00:30:20,710 --> 00:30:18,559 anyway 855 00:30:22,070 --> 00:30:20,720 if stars form in clusters the masses 856 00:30:23,430 --> 00:30:22,080 stars tend to be at the center of the 857 00:30:25,190 --> 00:30:23,440 cluster you have all these low mass 858 00:30:27,350 --> 00:30:25,200 stars that are sort of orbiting around 859 00:30:29,510 --> 00:30:27,360 the center of the cluster maybe 100 or 860 00:30:31,430 --> 00:30:29,520 10 000 of these low mass stars and 861 00:30:32,950 --> 00:30:31,440 they're at distances typically of a 862 00:30:34,070 --> 00:30:32,960 tenth of a light year 863 00:30:35,830 --> 00:30:34,080 pretty close 864 00:30:37,830 --> 00:30:35,840 and this radiation from the star then 865 00:30:39,350 --> 00:30:37,840 heats up the surface this massive star 866 00:30:41,669 --> 00:30:39,360 heats up the surface of the disc and 867 00:30:44,070 --> 00:30:41,679 causes it to photo evaporate 868 00:30:46,789 --> 00:30:44,080 so here is a picture of a cluster uh 869 00:30:48,470 --> 00:30:46,799 this is in orion and uh it maybe is a 870 00:30:51,350 --> 00:30:48,480 little washed out i hope you can see it 871 00:30:53,750 --> 00:30:51,360 out there in television land uh 872 00:30:56,870 --> 00:30:53,760 this is the orion nebula so it's in the 873 00:30:58,070 --> 00:30:56,880 uh sort of sheath of uh of orion's where 874 00:30:59,830 --> 00:30:58,080 a sword is 875 00:31:02,310 --> 00:30:59,840 there's the trapezium stars four very 876 00:31:05,190 --> 00:31:02,320 bright stars that form a trapezium one 877 00:31:06,870 --> 00:31:05,200 of them theta 1c is the brightest it's 878 00:31:08,389 --> 00:31:06,880 about a 30 solar mass star it's very 879 00:31:10,470 --> 00:31:08,399 luminous and then you've got all these 880 00:31:12,070 --> 00:31:10,480 little dots are low mass stars that have 881 00:31:13,669 --> 00:31:12,080 formed in the last million years in this 882 00:31:15,669 --> 00:31:13,679 cluster of stars and they're being 883 00:31:16,950 --> 00:31:15,679 illuminated by this very massive 884 00:31:18,870 --> 00:31:16,960 luminous star 885 00:31:20,630 --> 00:31:18,880 at close range 886 00:31:21,350 --> 00:31:20,640 so here's a blown up picture of one of 887 00:31:24,310 --> 00:31:21,360 them 888 00:31:25,830 --> 00:31:24,320 this is hst-10 discovered by the hubble 889 00:31:27,830 --> 00:31:25,840 space well actually it wasn't discovered 890 00:31:29,110 --> 00:31:27,840 that uh the hubble really took the great 891 00:31:30,389 --> 00:31:29,120 pictures of it 892 00:31:33,110 --> 00:31:30,399 this is uh 893 00:31:34,389 --> 00:31:33,120 a hubble space telescope image of this 894 00:31:36,549 --> 00:31:34,399 one star 895 00:31:38,070 --> 00:31:36,559 the star the low mass star is not really 896 00:31:40,549 --> 00:31:38,080 seen in this picture it's right at the 897 00:31:42,389 --> 00:31:40,559 center of this little green ring uh and 898 00:31:44,310 --> 00:31:42,399 it's slightly obscured because the disc 899 00:31:45,909 --> 00:31:44,320 is sort of slightly edge on and you 900 00:31:47,750 --> 00:31:45,919 can't quite see the star you can 901 00:31:49,110 --> 00:31:47,760 actually see it in some images 902 00:31:51,830 --> 00:31:49,120 and then this is the disc and it's sort 903 00:31:53,990 --> 00:31:51,840 of glowing in green it's being heated up 904 00:31:55,509 --> 00:31:54,000 the neutral gas is being heated up to 905 00:31:58,310 --> 00:31:55,519 thousands of degrees and it's actually 906 00:31:59,430 --> 00:31:58,320 glowing in an atomic oxygen line that 907 00:32:01,909 --> 00:31:59,440 you see 908 00:32:03,990 --> 00:32:01,919 uh then there is neutral gas that's 909 00:32:05,830 --> 00:32:04,000 heated that's photo evaporating off of 910 00:32:07,430 --> 00:32:05,840 this disc 911 00:32:09,590 --> 00:32:07,440 and then by the time it gets out to 912 00:32:12,310 --> 00:32:09,600 where this bright region is it becomes 913 00:32:14,230 --> 00:32:12,320 ionized due to these euv photons that 914 00:32:16,389 --> 00:32:14,240 can ionize hydrogen that are being 915 00:32:18,470 --> 00:32:16,399 emitted by this very massive star which 916 00:32:21,269 --> 00:32:18,480 is up in this direction away from this 917 00:32:22,789 --> 00:32:21,279 very bright spot here it's up this way 918 00:32:24,950 --> 00:32:22,799 and so now those photons are then 919 00:32:26,789 --> 00:32:24,960 ionizing and when this gasket ionized it 920 00:32:29,750 --> 00:32:26,799 starts to glow and that's what's glowing 921 00:32:31,190 --> 00:32:29,760 uh is these this ionized gas it's 922 00:32:32,950 --> 00:32:31,200 actually hydrogen it's a line of 923 00:32:35,830 --> 00:32:32,960 hydrogen that's 924 00:32:37,750 --> 00:32:35,840 recombining actually uh but it forms 925 00:32:39,669 --> 00:32:37,760 this sort of reddish and bright bright 926 00:32:41,509 --> 00:32:39,679 glow 927 00:32:43,750 --> 00:32:41,519 so this is actually you're seeing a disc 928 00:32:46,230 --> 00:32:43,760 being photo evaporated here and you're 929 00:32:47,750 --> 00:32:46,240 seeing the neutral material moving out 930 00:32:50,710 --> 00:32:47,760 and then eventually getting ionized by 931 00:32:52,549 --> 00:32:50,720 the photo ionizing photons from theta 1 932 00:32:58,070 --> 00:32:52,559 c 933 00:33:00,149 --> 00:32:58,080 evaporated 934 00:33:03,350 --> 00:33:00,159 by these external stars 935 00:33:06,070 --> 00:33:03,360 so this is a plot that shows the plots 936 00:33:09,029 --> 00:33:06,080 the mass of the central star the masses 937 00:33:11,430 --> 00:33:09,039 are on the horizontal axis and then the 938 00:33:13,669 --> 00:33:11,440 mass loss rate on the vertical axis from 939 00:33:15,029 --> 00:33:13,679 from the low mass star that's near this 940 00:33:16,789 --> 00:33:15,039 massive star 941 00:33:18,870 --> 00:33:16,799 uh this is the mass loss rate and over 942 00:33:20,310 --> 00:33:18,880 here a kind of a depending on the mass 943 00:33:21,909 --> 00:33:20,320 of the disc this gives you an idea of 944 00:33:24,070 --> 00:33:21,919 what the time scale for the disc to 945 00:33:26,070 --> 00:33:24,080 evaporate is from ten to the fifth years 946 00:33:27,750 --> 00:33:26,080 to ten to seven years so the way you 947 00:33:29,350 --> 00:33:27,760 interpret this is that if you're a low 948 00:33:32,149 --> 00:33:29,360 mass star like the sun and you're in a 949 00:33:34,070 --> 00:33:32,159 cluster of maybe fifty stars 950 00:33:35,909 --> 00:33:34,080 and so your most massive star is maybe a 951 00:33:37,269 --> 00:33:35,919 four or five solar mass star which is 952 00:33:41,029 --> 00:33:37,279 down here 953 00:33:42,710 --> 00:33:41,039 then you will evaporate to 80 au 954 00:33:44,230 --> 00:33:42,720 you're evaporating from outside in in 955 00:33:45,590 --> 00:33:44,240 this case from an external star 956 00:33:46,389 --> 00:33:45,600 evaporating 957 00:33:50,310 --> 00:33:46,399 you 958 00:33:52,470 --> 00:33:50,320 years 959 00:33:54,389 --> 00:33:52,480 but if you're in a cluster of 2 000 960 00:33:56,310 --> 00:33:54,399 stars where your most massive star may 961 00:33:57,590 --> 00:33:56,320 be 20 or 30 solar masses like in the 962 00:33:59,110 --> 00:33:57,600 orion case 963 00:34:01,750 --> 00:33:59,120 then you evaporate 964 00:34:02,710 --> 00:34:01,760 down to a 20 au or 10 au in a million 965 00:34:04,630 --> 00:34:02,720 years 966 00:34:06,870 --> 00:34:04,640 you evaporate to a very long small 967 00:34:09,190 --> 00:34:06,880 radius and then the viscosity will take 968 00:34:10,950 --> 00:34:09,200 care of that inner part very rapidly as 969 00:34:15,270 --> 00:34:10,960 well so the whole disc will go away in 970 00:34:20,230 --> 00:34:17,829 so we can plot for the orion conditions 971 00:34:22,149 --> 00:34:20,240 which are fairly extreme 0.2 parsecs 972 00:34:24,069 --> 00:34:22,159 from a 30 solar mass star we can plot 973 00:34:25,990 --> 00:34:24,079 this time scale to evaporate due to the 974 00:34:28,230 --> 00:34:26,000 external star so there's two e's 975 00:34:30,389 --> 00:34:28,240 evaporation and external 976 00:34:32,950 --> 00:34:30,399 and this time scale looks like this the 977 00:34:34,869 --> 00:34:32,960 blue is by the evaporation caused by the 978 00:34:37,030 --> 00:34:34,879 hydrogen ionizing photons and the green 979 00:34:39,510 --> 00:34:37,040 is the evaporation caused by the 980 00:34:41,030 --> 00:34:39,520 fuv photons which can't ionize hydrogen 981 00:34:42,389 --> 00:34:41,040 and this is as a function of the radius 982 00:34:44,069 --> 00:34:42,399 of the disk so you see that there's very 983 00:34:45,270 --> 00:34:44,079 short time scales to evaporate the outer 984 00:34:47,109 --> 00:34:45,280 part of the disk 985 00:34:49,909 --> 00:34:47,119 so the disks rapidly evaporate and 986 00:34:52,069 --> 00:34:49,919 truncate inward and then eventually 987 00:34:53,190 --> 00:34:52,079 they get truncated to a point where 988 00:34:56,629 --> 00:34:53,200 viscous 989 00:35:00,390 --> 00:34:59,190 so for astrobiology the key question is 990 00:35:02,390 --> 00:35:00,400 then 991 00:35:04,550 --> 00:35:02,400 what fraction of solar mass fires like 992 00:35:06,470 --> 00:35:04,560 the sun spend a sufficient time close to 993 00:35:08,550 --> 00:35:06,480 a massive star in their early evolution 994 00:35:09,990 --> 00:35:08,560 that their disks are dispersed in less 995 00:35:11,510 --> 00:35:10,000 than a few million years which is sort 996 00:35:13,750 --> 00:35:11,520 of the time scale we think we need in 997 00:35:15,270 --> 00:35:13,760 order to form planets particularly giant 998 00:35:16,870 --> 00:35:15,280 gas giant planets 999 00:35:19,829 --> 00:35:16,880 and thereby affecting the plant 1000 00:35:22,470 --> 00:35:19,839 formation and the answer uh and fred 1001 00:35:25,109 --> 00:35:22,480 adams uh has been working on this with a 1002 00:35:27,910 --> 00:35:25,119 tusso and others and and and we've been 1003 00:35:29,589 --> 00:35:27,920 working on this too and 1004 00:35:31,430 --> 00:35:29,599 we're trying to get it somewhat more 1005 00:35:32,790 --> 00:35:31,440 accurately at present time but it's 1006 00:35:34,710 --> 00:35:32,800 somewhere between five and thirty 1007 00:35:37,030 --> 00:35:34,720 percent so it's not a huge fraction of 1008 00:35:38,550 --> 00:35:37,040 the stars in our galaxy that this exp 1009 00:35:39,750 --> 00:35:38,560 happens to maybe it's on the order of 1010 00:35:41,750 --> 00:35:39,760 ten percent 1011 00:35:43,109 --> 00:35:41,760 so that it is happening to some and so 1012 00:35:45,190 --> 00:35:43,119 there's going to be some systems where 1013 00:35:47,270 --> 00:35:45,200 they were near a massive star and they 1014 00:35:49,190 --> 00:35:47,280 just got they're just blown away and 1015 00:35:51,670 --> 00:35:49,200 it's really going to seriously affect 1016 00:35:53,190 --> 00:35:51,680 planet formation but it's probably not a 1017 00:35:55,109 --> 00:35:53,200 huge effect 1018 00:35:56,710 --> 00:35:55,119 and we see that i mean as i said jeff 1019 00:35:59,030 --> 00:35:56,720 marcy and his crew has seen that there's 1020 00:36:01,589 --> 00:35:59,040 a high percentage of stars that do seem 1021 00:36:03,910 --> 00:36:01,599 to have planets so this is corresponds 1022 00:36:05,510 --> 00:36:03,920 to what we're seeing 1023 00:36:07,589 --> 00:36:05,520 so finally we need to look at the photo 1024 00:36:09,430 --> 00:36:07,599 evaporation by the central star itself 1025 00:36:11,030 --> 00:36:09,440 not by some external star in a cluster 1026 00:36:13,349 --> 00:36:11,040 so this will happen to any star even 1027 00:36:15,109 --> 00:36:13,359 some isolated star that's borne off not 1028 00:36:17,109 --> 00:36:15,119 near a massive star 1029 00:36:20,150 --> 00:36:17,119 and so the same process occurs that 1030 00:36:23,430 --> 00:36:21,670 um and uh 1031 00:36:25,510 --> 00:36:23,440 so i'm going to show you a result from 1032 00:36:27,589 --> 00:36:25,520 one of these models that takes a week to 1033 00:36:30,230 --> 00:36:27,599 run and i'm only going to show you the 1034 00:36:31,750 --> 00:36:30,240 the solution that at nine astronomical 1035 00:36:34,069 --> 00:36:31,760 units from the star so what we're 1036 00:36:36,230 --> 00:36:34,079 looking here is that a vertical cut 1037 00:36:38,790 --> 00:36:36,240 in the disk from the mid plane which is 1038 00:36:41,510 --> 00:36:38,800 at zero here on the horizontal axis 1039 00:36:43,270 --> 00:36:41,520 up vertically z is as vertical height 1040 00:36:45,109 --> 00:36:43,280 above the mid plane and then we're 1041 00:36:48,310 --> 00:36:45,119 plotting both the temperature and the 1042 00:36:49,510 --> 00:36:48,320 density of gas and dust 1043 00:36:51,430 --> 00:36:49,520 so this is actually the density of the 1044 00:36:53,990 --> 00:36:51,440 gas here let's go with that first so at 1045 00:36:56,230 --> 00:36:54,000 the mid plane the density which is shown 1046 00:36:57,910 --> 00:36:56,240 over here the log of the density is 1047 00:36:59,990 --> 00:36:57,920 shown over here in particles per cubic 1048 00:37:01,829 --> 00:37:00,000 centimeter the density is 10 to the 12th 1049 00:37:02,790 --> 00:37:01,839 hydrogens per cubic centimeters quite 1050 00:37:04,230 --> 00:37:02,800 dense 1051 00:37:06,069 --> 00:37:04,240 and at the midplane you see that the 1052 00:37:07,190 --> 00:37:06,079 temperature of the gas and the dust are 1053 00:37:08,790 --> 00:37:07,200 both equal 1054 00:37:12,630 --> 00:37:08,800 and they're about i don't know 70 1055 00:37:13,670 --> 00:37:12,640 degrees or i can't read it 50 70 degrees 1056 00:37:15,349 --> 00:37:13,680 uh 1057 00:37:17,510 --> 00:37:15,359 then as you go up vertically you see 1058 00:37:18,870 --> 00:37:17,520 that the gas and dust the density is 1059 00:37:20,310 --> 00:37:18,880 dropping because you're kind of going up 1060 00:37:22,630 --> 00:37:20,320 in the disc getting up more in the 1061 00:37:24,710 --> 00:37:22,640 atmosphere of the disc density is 1062 00:37:26,950 --> 00:37:24,720 dropping rapidly the and the temperature 1063 00:37:29,030 --> 00:37:26,960 then starts to rise because the gas and 1064 00:37:30,870 --> 00:37:29,040 dust start to see the stellar photons 1065 00:37:32,390 --> 00:37:30,880 and that starts to warm them at the mid 1066 00:37:34,390 --> 00:37:32,400 plane they're just heated by the 1067 00:37:37,750 --> 00:37:34,400 infrared radiation field 1068 00:37:39,270 --> 00:37:37,760 of the dust of the disc itself 1069 00:37:41,910 --> 00:37:39,280 but then as they get up higher they 1070 00:37:43,109 --> 00:37:41,920 start to see the stellar photons 1071 00:37:44,550 --> 00:37:43,119 because they're up higher in the 1072 00:37:46,470 --> 00:37:44,560 atmosphere where they can start to see 1073 00:37:48,470 --> 00:37:46,480 the star and they start to heat up and 1074 00:37:50,230 --> 00:37:48,480 the dust then eventually as it sees the 1075 00:37:52,630 --> 00:37:50,240 stellar photons reaches an equilibrium 1076 00:37:54,710 --> 00:37:52,640 temperature of a couple hundred degrees 1077 00:37:56,150 --> 00:37:54,720 but the gas keeps getting hotter because 1078 00:37:58,710 --> 00:37:56,160 it's being heated by x-rays and 1079 00:38:00,630 --> 00:37:58,720 ultraviolet photons and this is a 1080 00:38:02,390 --> 00:38:00,640 situation of a gas of around a one solar 1081 00:38:04,630 --> 00:38:02,400 mass star where we put in some typical 1082 00:38:07,109 --> 00:38:04,640 values of what the x-ray luminosity of 1083 00:38:10,870 --> 00:38:07,119 these young solar mass stars are and the 1084 00:38:13,430 --> 00:38:10,880 uv fluxes from these young stars 1085 00:38:16,150 --> 00:38:13,440 this shows av of one is to the star 1086 00:38:18,069 --> 00:38:16,160 that's the av in astronomers lingo is 1087 00:38:19,990 --> 00:38:18,079 kind of this is where you start to get a 1088 00:38:21,349 --> 00:38:20,000 real clear view of the star up in the 1089 00:38:23,030 --> 00:38:21,359 disc 1090 00:38:24,630 --> 00:38:23,040 in the visible 1091 00:38:25,829 --> 00:38:24,640 and this is where the molecular hydrogen 1092 00:38:28,069 --> 00:38:25,839 turns atomic because it's 1093 00:38:30,550 --> 00:38:28,079 photodissociated by the uv photons from 1094 00:38:32,550 --> 00:38:30,560 the star this is where co 1095 00:38:35,270 --> 00:38:32,560 turns to ionized carbon because of the 1096 00:38:37,910 --> 00:38:35,280 uv dissociation of co and ionization of 1097 00:38:39,990 --> 00:38:37,920 carbon by the uv from the star 1098 00:38:41,829 --> 00:38:40,000 you can see that eventually the euv 1099 00:38:44,950 --> 00:38:41,839 photons which can ionize hydrogen heat 1100 00:38:47,109 --> 00:38:44,960 the gas up to 10 000 degrees here 1101 00:38:49,190 --> 00:38:47,119 in this case at 9 a.u this is where the 1102 00:38:51,190 --> 00:38:49,200 photo evaporated flow starts right at 1103 00:38:53,510 --> 00:38:51,200 the base of this ionized layer this is 1104 00:38:55,430 --> 00:38:53,520 where the flow starts coming off and you 1105 00:38:58,230 --> 00:38:55,440 start evaporating the disc further out 1106 00:39:00,150 --> 00:38:58,240 in the disc it's this neutral heated gas 1107 00:39:02,870 --> 00:39:00,160 by the fuv that actually where the flow 1108 00:39:06,069 --> 00:39:04,390 so that gives you an idea of these 1109 00:39:09,030 --> 00:39:06,079 models and how they do the chemistry and 1110 00:39:11,510 --> 00:39:09,040 the flow and the temperature of the gas 1111 00:39:14,550 --> 00:39:11,520 so if you do the central star you get 1112 00:39:16,230 --> 00:39:14,560 this is for a one solar mass star again 1113 00:39:18,310 --> 00:39:16,240 the central star this is the blue is 1114 00:39:20,710 --> 00:39:18,320 caused by the uv photons that can ionize 1115 00:39:22,870 --> 00:39:20,720 hydrogen and the green is by the fuv 1116 00:39:25,670 --> 00:39:22,880 photons there is this tendency to burn a 1117 00:39:28,069 --> 00:39:25,680 hole at one au that the euv photons have 1118 00:39:30,630 --> 00:39:28,079 the time scales get short your mass loss 1119 00:39:32,630 --> 00:39:30,640 is high there and then you out here the 1120 00:39:34,870 --> 00:39:32,640 fpv photons take over and they warm the 1121 00:39:37,270 --> 00:39:34,880 gas enough to get a pretty vigorous flow 1122 00:39:39,510 --> 00:39:37,280 going and particularly short time scales 1123 00:39:42,630 --> 00:39:39,520 at large radio so that would tend to 1124 00:39:43,510 --> 00:39:42,640 truncate these discs and it makes this 1125 00:39:45,430 --> 00:39:43,520 uh 1126 00:39:48,950 --> 00:39:45,440 very rapidly photo evaporate once they 1127 00:39:51,589 --> 00:39:48,960 get bigger than 100au 1128 00:39:53,510 --> 00:39:51,599 so let's uh see how we're doing okay 1129 00:39:55,430 --> 00:39:53,520 i'm now going to combine all these time 1130 00:39:57,349 --> 00:39:55,440 scales to give you an idea of what now 1131 00:39:59,190 --> 00:39:57,359 is the most important 1132 00:40:02,069 --> 00:39:59,200 and so we've got the 1133 00:40:05,030 --> 00:40:02,079 viscous time scale in red here plotted 1134 00:40:07,270 --> 00:40:05,040 as a function of the radius and the disk 1135 00:40:09,589 --> 00:40:07,280 these time scales to get rid of the gas 1136 00:40:12,230 --> 00:40:09,599 the wind time scales the evaporation by 1137 00:40:13,910 --> 00:40:12,240 the central star by an external star and 1138 00:40:16,150 --> 00:40:13,920 by stellar encounters first thing you 1139 00:40:17,190 --> 00:40:16,160 see stellar encounters are then rarely 1140 00:40:19,109 --> 00:40:17,200 important 1141 00:40:21,190 --> 00:40:19,119 uh maybe if the disks start off to be a 1142 00:40:22,550 --> 00:40:21,200 thousand au in size the the stellar 1143 00:40:24,870 --> 00:40:22,560 encounters will get to be important in 1144 00:40:26,710 --> 00:40:24,880 truncating a very big disc 1145 00:40:29,349 --> 00:40:26,720 in these clusters 1146 00:40:31,430 --> 00:40:29,359 but what you see is the wind maybe has a 1147 00:40:33,589 --> 00:40:31,440 little bit of importance at 10 a.u but 1148 00:40:35,430 --> 00:40:33,599 it tends to be overshadowed by viscous 1149 00:40:37,589 --> 00:40:35,440 evolution in the inner part and it's 1150 00:40:39,589 --> 00:40:37,599 certainly overshadowed by evaporation 1151 00:40:42,310 --> 00:40:39,599 photo evaporation in the outer parts 1152 00:40:44,390 --> 00:40:42,320 where these time scales get short 1153 00:40:46,470 --> 00:40:44,400 so this external star is a pretty 1154 00:40:48,470 --> 00:40:46,480 extreme case and even this extreme case 1155 00:40:50,790 --> 00:40:48,480 doesn't compete that much with the 1156 00:40:52,710 --> 00:40:50,800 central stars effect on the disc so i'm 1157 00:40:54,710 --> 00:40:52,720 just ignore the external part and we're 1158 00:40:56,150 --> 00:40:54,720 just going to now plot the three 1159 00:40:57,990 --> 00:40:56,160 important ones then that have the short 1160 00:40:59,750 --> 00:40:58,000 time scales you've got viscous secretion 1161 00:41:01,430 --> 00:40:59,760 in the inner part 1162 00:41:03,030 --> 00:41:01,440 the winds maybe a little bit here and 1163 00:41:04,390 --> 00:41:03,040 then you've got the evaporation by the 1164 00:41:07,349 --> 00:41:04,400 central star 1165 00:41:08,870 --> 00:41:07,359 in the outer part and as i said this 1166 00:41:10,390 --> 00:41:08,880 does not mean that the inner part of 1167 00:41:12,950 --> 00:41:10,400 those intent of the fifth year is due to 1168 00:41:14,710 --> 00:41:12,960 viscous evolution what happens is that 1169 00:41:18,230 --> 00:41:14,720 this part of the disc lasts for a few 1170 00:41:20,950 --> 00:41:18,240 million years out here at 10 to 30 au 1171 00:41:23,030 --> 00:41:20,960 and then that viscously is replacing 1172 00:41:25,990 --> 00:41:23,040 this material inwards that's creeping 1173 00:41:27,990 --> 00:41:26,000 fairly rapidly onto the star 1174 00:41:29,990 --> 00:41:28,000 so that's the conclusion of these 1175 00:41:31,030 --> 00:41:30,000 dispersal mechanisms and you can start 1176 00:41:32,550 --> 00:41:31,040 to see 1177 00:41:33,829 --> 00:41:32,560 why uh 1178 00:41:35,829 --> 00:41:33,839 this 1179 00:41:38,630 --> 00:41:35,839 lose a lot of their mass and not all the 1180 00:41:41,750 --> 00:41:38,640 mass goes into planets 1181 00:41:43,870 --> 00:41:41,760 so let's now combine the two important 1182 00:41:45,750 --> 00:41:43,880 ones the viscous evolution and 1183 00:41:47,349 --> 00:41:45,760 photoevaporation and see how it disc 1184 00:41:49,030 --> 00:41:47,359 evolves we're starting to do evolution 1185 00:41:51,349 --> 00:41:49,040 calculations now 1186 00:41:53,829 --> 00:41:51,359 to do these we've had to make severe 1187 00:41:56,069 --> 00:41:53,839 approximations as to calculating the gas 1188 00:41:58,390 --> 00:41:56,079 temperature if we try to fully do the 1189 00:41:59,910 --> 00:41:58,400 chemistry and the thermal balance along 1190 00:42:02,069 --> 00:41:59,920 with the evolution that would take years 1191 00:42:03,829 --> 00:42:02,079 on a computer so we have this very 1192 00:42:05,270 --> 00:42:03,839 simple at this point it's a very simple 1193 00:42:06,790 --> 00:42:05,280 approximation and we're working toward 1194 00:42:08,470 --> 00:42:06,800 getting more sophisticated ones because 1195 00:42:09,829 --> 00:42:08,480 it's very sensitive to the gas 1196 00:42:11,990 --> 00:42:09,839 temperature but i think this will give 1197 00:42:14,710 --> 00:42:12,000 you an idea of what happens i'm pretty 1198 00:42:16,390 --> 00:42:14,720 sure that this gives a basic idea 1199 00:42:18,069 --> 00:42:16,400 so what i'm plotting here is the surface 1200 00:42:19,670 --> 00:42:18,079 density of the discs if you look 1201 00:42:21,510 --> 00:42:19,680 vertically through the disks how many 1202 00:42:23,990 --> 00:42:21,520 grams per square centimeters are in a 1203 00:42:25,670 --> 00:42:24,000 disk as a function of radius 1204 00:42:27,270 --> 00:42:25,680 and i'm showing you the evolution from 1 1205 00:42:29,270 --> 00:42:27,280 million years to 10 million years we 1206 00:42:30,390 --> 00:42:29,280 started off i should have shown you the 1207 00:42:32,390 --> 00:42:30,400 start off point 1208 00:42:34,550 --> 00:42:32,400 it was a surface density that dropped is 1209 00:42:36,950 --> 00:42:34,560 one over radius out to 200 au and then 1210 00:42:38,950 --> 00:42:36,960 it was truncated at 200 au 1211 00:42:42,230 --> 00:42:38,960 astronomical units 1212 00:42:43,990 --> 00:42:42,240 so what happens is that the viscous 1213 00:42:46,710 --> 00:42:44,000 evolution tends to give you this one 1214 00:42:48,870 --> 00:42:46,720 over r distribution of surface density 1215 00:42:51,270 --> 00:42:48,880 and because the mass goes as the surface 1216 00:42:53,910 --> 00:42:51,280 density times the area which is radius 1217 00:42:56,230 --> 00:42:53,920 squared most of the mass is actually out 1218 00:42:57,510 --> 00:42:56,240 here at 100 au 1219 00:42:59,270 --> 00:42:57,520 even though the surface density is 1220 00:43:00,790 --> 00:42:59,280 higher inward 1221 00:43:02,630 --> 00:43:00,800 so what you see is that the surface 1222 00:43:04,470 --> 00:43:02,640 density maintains a kind of a one over r 1223 00:43:06,630 --> 00:43:04,480 squared distribution and with just 1224 00:43:08,710 --> 00:43:06,640 viscous evolution going on 1225 00:43:10,550 --> 00:43:08,720 the mass is dropping some it maybe drops 1226 00:43:12,790 --> 00:43:10,560 a factor of 10 in the disk because it's 1227 00:43:14,630 --> 00:43:12,800 accreting onto the central star 1228 00:43:16,230 --> 00:43:14,640 but it also spreads you can see this 1229 00:43:18,309 --> 00:43:16,240 spreading effect you're getting material 1230 00:43:21,109 --> 00:43:18,319 now out of 1000 of you or even 10 000 of 1231 00:43:23,190 --> 00:43:21,119 you it's just the disc is spreading 1232 00:43:24,870 --> 00:43:23,200 so we can follow that evolution even i'm 1233 00:43:27,030 --> 00:43:24,880 sorry so now let's add 1234 00:43:29,270 --> 00:43:27,040 euv 1235 00:43:31,589 --> 00:43:29,280 that photo evaporation we just turn on 1236 00:43:34,630 --> 00:43:31,599 the hydrogen ionizing photons from this 1237 00:43:36,309 --> 00:43:34,640 one solar mass star shining on this disc 1238 00:43:38,230 --> 00:43:36,319 well for the first 10 million years it's 1239 00:43:40,230 --> 00:43:38,240 absolutely nothing happens the euv is 1240 00:43:43,430 --> 00:43:40,240 too weak even this is a very generous 1241 00:43:45,910 --> 00:43:43,440 amount of euv for a a one solar mass 1242 00:43:47,670 --> 00:43:45,920 star uh early in its evolution and even 1243 00:43:49,589 --> 00:43:47,680 with this generous amount 1244 00:43:51,750 --> 00:43:49,599 it's identical to just viscously 1245 00:43:53,589 --> 00:43:51,760 evolving for 10 million years the euv is 1246 00:43:55,109 --> 00:43:53,599 trying to eat away at 1au but there's 1247 00:43:55,990 --> 00:43:55,119 just so much mass there it's not doing 1248 00:43:57,910 --> 00:43:56,000 much 1249 00:44:00,390 --> 00:43:57,920 so you have to wait for the 1250 00:44:02,309 --> 00:44:00,400 surface density to drop at 1au for 1251 00:44:04,630 --> 00:44:02,319 anything to happen and so you have to 1252 00:44:06,630 --> 00:44:04,640 wait for the viscous evolution to keep 1253 00:44:09,349 --> 00:44:06,640 spreading the disc of creating the disc 1254 00:44:11,910 --> 00:44:09,359 lowering the mass so we now evolved it 1255 00:44:13,829 --> 00:44:11,920 for 22 million years and so the surface 1256 00:44:15,750 --> 00:44:13,839 density now this is at 10 million years 1257 00:44:17,190 --> 00:44:15,760 now the solid one 1258 00:44:18,790 --> 00:44:17,200 as you get close to 20 million years the 1259 00:44:21,349 --> 00:44:18,800 surface density drops enough that now 1260 00:44:23,750 --> 00:44:21,359 the euv you see it eating at 1au you see 1261 00:44:25,910 --> 00:44:23,760 it eating this hole in the disc 1262 00:44:27,190 --> 00:44:25,920 and you can see this little kink right 1263 00:44:29,670 --> 00:44:27,200 here 1264 00:44:31,589 --> 00:44:29,680 as it starts to eat this hole at i guess 1265 00:44:33,670 --> 00:44:31,599 it's about 20 million years 1266 00:44:36,710 --> 00:44:33,680 and then in the next time step which is 1267 00:44:38,069 --> 00:44:36,720 just a little bit after that it produces 1268 00:44:39,829 --> 00:44:38,079 a gap 1269 00:44:41,430 --> 00:44:39,839 at 1au you can 1270 00:44:42,950 --> 00:44:41,440 we didn't quite catch it in this so you 1271 00:44:45,190 --> 00:44:42,960 can see a little bit of material still 1272 00:44:47,109 --> 00:44:45,200 inside of one of you but very rapidly 1273 00:44:49,270 --> 00:44:47,119 then the whole inner part viscously it 1274 00:44:51,349 --> 00:44:49,280 creaks onto the star it just spirals 1275 00:44:53,510 --> 00:44:51,359 into the star from 1au inward and you 1276 00:44:56,550 --> 00:44:53,520 get a big hole in the center and you get 1277 00:44:58,870 --> 00:44:56,560 this torus of material outside of 1au 1278 00:45:01,910 --> 00:44:58,880 which then the euv photons each from the 1279 00:45:03,670 --> 00:45:01,920 inside out and you can see this 1280 00:45:05,750 --> 00:45:03,680 here it is at one time step at the next 1281 00:45:07,510 --> 00:45:05,760 at the next it's eating it out but 1282 00:45:09,270 --> 00:45:07,520 viciously it's kind of the disc has 1283 00:45:11,510 --> 00:45:09,280 spread so you have this torus of 1284 00:45:12,630 --> 00:45:11,520 material out at 100 or 1000 au of dust 1285 00:45:14,710 --> 00:45:12,640 and gas 1286 00:45:16,710 --> 00:45:14,720 so if this were really what was going on 1287 00:45:18,550 --> 00:45:16,720 in plant formation we would have first 1288 00:45:20,630 --> 00:45:18,560 of all uranus and neptune 1289 00:45:22,950 --> 00:45:20,640 which don't have much gas would be gas 1290 00:45:24,630 --> 00:45:22,960 rich like jupiter and saturn if this is 1291 00:45:26,790 --> 00:45:24,640 what were happening we'd probably have 1292 00:45:28,870 --> 00:45:26,800 more kuiper belt objects more comets i 1293 00:45:31,109 --> 00:45:28,880 mean we might have more planets out at 1294 00:45:33,030 --> 00:45:31,119 hundreds of au but we can observe that 1295 00:45:35,430 --> 00:45:33,040 this is not what's happening the dust 1296 00:45:37,270 --> 00:45:35,440 and gas is not surviving this long out 1297 00:45:39,829 --> 00:45:37,280 here at 100 au 1298 00:45:42,550 --> 00:45:39,839 so it's not just viscous secretion and 1299 00:45:45,109 --> 00:45:42,560 euv photo evaporation that's occurring 1300 00:45:47,190 --> 00:45:45,119 so now we add fuv evaporation this is 1301 00:45:49,750 --> 00:45:47,200 without euv this is just the ones that 1302 00:45:51,829 --> 00:45:49,760 can't ionize hydrogen but they can heat 1303 00:45:54,309 --> 00:45:51,839 up the surface gas 1304 00:45:56,069 --> 00:45:54,319 particularly out quite far 1305 00:45:57,910 --> 00:45:56,079 and you can see that what happens is 1306 00:45:59,910 --> 00:45:57,920 that with a reasonable amount of this 1307 00:46:01,750 --> 00:45:59,920 fuv luminosity quite comparable to what 1308 00:46:02,710 --> 00:46:01,760 we observe in these low mass stars like 1309 00:46:05,109 --> 00:46:02,720 the sun 1310 00:46:07,990 --> 00:46:05,119 that with fuv and with the viscous 1311 00:46:10,550 --> 00:46:08,000 evolution what we have is that the 1312 00:46:12,790 --> 00:46:10,560 outside is being eaten away by this 1313 00:46:14,550 --> 00:46:12,800 evaporation you can see the time it's 1314 00:46:17,190 --> 00:46:14,560 truncating closer and closer in the 1315 00:46:19,109 --> 00:46:17,200 outside is being eaten by fpv viscous is 1316 00:46:21,990 --> 00:46:19,119 trying to push it out but as it pushes 1317 00:46:23,829 --> 00:46:22,000 it out it just gets evaporated away and 1318 00:46:26,150 --> 00:46:23,839 you can see that in a few million years 1319 00:46:29,270 --> 00:46:26,160 the the surface density goes down 1320 00:46:31,910 --> 00:46:29,280 and very rapidly you can also see that 1321 00:46:33,750 --> 00:46:31,920 there isn't much left i mean once this 1322 00:46:35,750 --> 00:46:33,760 combination of viscous evolution and 1323 00:46:37,510 --> 00:46:35,760 photo evaporation are taking place you 1324 00:46:39,910 --> 00:46:37,520 don't have 10 to the minus two jupiter 1325 00:46:41,670 --> 00:46:39,920 masses to circularize the orbits of 1326 00:46:44,230 --> 00:46:41,680 lunar mass things i mean it just goes 1327 00:46:46,309 --> 00:46:44,240 away fast very fast 1328 00:46:49,190 --> 00:46:46,319 all goes away 1329 00:46:51,829 --> 00:46:49,200 so now we combine euv and fuv and 1330 00:46:53,670 --> 00:46:51,839 viscous evolution and that even shortens 1331 00:46:55,910 --> 00:46:53,680 it a little bit more now it takes only 1332 00:46:58,150 --> 00:46:55,920 about 2.7 million years for it to come 1333 00:47:01,190 --> 00:46:58,160 basically completely go away and you can 1334 00:47:03,349 --> 00:47:01,200 see that the combination of the fuv and 1335 00:47:05,829 --> 00:47:03,359 the viscous evolution drives the surface 1336 00:47:07,510 --> 00:47:05,839 density down and then euv burns a hole 1337 00:47:09,990 --> 00:47:07,520 at one au you see this little gap i 1338 00:47:12,390 --> 00:47:10,000 should call it a gap first there's a gap 1339 00:47:14,550 --> 00:47:12,400 here and then in a time step to 2.7 1340 00:47:17,430 --> 00:47:14,560 million years all that material inside 1341 00:47:19,030 --> 00:47:17,440 the gap this material that's shown here 1342 00:47:21,670 --> 00:47:19,040 just all it creates onto the central 1343 00:47:23,990 --> 00:47:21,680 star and you get a torus that briefly 1344 00:47:25,190 --> 00:47:24,000 exists between 10 and 100 au but briefly 1345 00:47:27,270 --> 00:47:25,200 meaning 10 to the fifth years this 1346 00:47:28,309 --> 00:47:27,280 doesn't last long that you have a little 1347 00:47:30,230 --> 00:47:28,319 sort of a 1348 00:47:34,069 --> 00:47:30,240 inner hole with an outer disc but it 1349 00:47:38,710 --> 00:47:36,069 so it's maybe easier to see if i plot it 1350 00:47:40,230 --> 00:47:38,720 just as the disc mass versus uh 1351 00:47:41,109 --> 00:47:40,240 time 1352 00:47:43,430 --> 00:47:41,119 um 1353 00:47:45,829 --> 00:47:43,440 and so here i'm plotting the mass of the 1354 00:47:47,510 --> 00:47:45,839 disc as a in solar masses 1355 00:47:51,109 --> 00:47:47,520 which starts off at a tenth of a solar 1356 00:47:53,109 --> 00:47:51,119 mass around a one solar mass star uh and 1357 00:47:54,950 --> 00:47:53,119 this solid line or this line here is 1358 00:47:57,349 --> 00:47:54,960 just viscous evolution and you can see 1359 00:47:59,030 --> 00:47:57,359 that the disc does keep getting less and 1360 00:48:00,950 --> 00:47:59,040 less in mass as material accretes on the 1361 00:48:03,829 --> 00:48:00,960 star but it's spreading and it's just 1362 00:48:05,270 --> 00:48:03,839 lowering its mass to a factor of 10 over 1363 00:48:07,589 --> 00:48:05,280 you know tens of millions of years this 1364 00:48:09,270 --> 00:48:07,599 we do not observe and this this would be 1365 00:48:10,710 --> 00:48:09,280 an optically thick disc existing for 1366 00:48:11,430 --> 00:48:10,720 very long periods of time which we don't 1367 00:48:13,589 --> 00:48:11,440 see 1368 00:48:16,069 --> 00:48:13,599 so that doesn't happen if we turn on the 1369 00:48:17,829 --> 00:48:16,079 euv it it still lasts too long but then 1370 00:48:20,069 --> 00:48:17,839 if the combination of viscous evolution 1371 00:48:21,910 --> 00:48:20,079 and euv does all of a sudden rapidly get 1372 00:48:23,990 --> 00:48:21,920 rid of the rest of the mass 1373 00:48:25,670 --> 00:48:24,000 the euv eats this hole in the disc and 1374 00:48:27,910 --> 00:48:25,680 then it rapidly photo evaporates the 1375 00:48:29,430 --> 00:48:27,920 outside part of the disc which viscously 1376 00:48:33,349 --> 00:48:29,440 would have lasted a long time but with 1377 00:48:35,270 --> 00:48:33,359 ev being added lasts a short time 1378 00:48:37,349 --> 00:48:35,280 but then if you add the fuv from the 1379 00:48:39,109 --> 00:48:37,359 star the non-hydrogen ionizing photons 1380 00:48:41,670 --> 00:48:39,119 we get an evolution where the disc mass 1381 00:48:44,549 --> 00:48:41,680 very rapidly cuts off uh to very low 1382 00:48:46,630 --> 00:48:44,559 values at a few million years 1383 00:48:47,589 --> 00:48:46,640 and that's kind of what we see and so we 1384 00:48:50,069 --> 00:48:47,599 think that we're starting to 1385 00:48:51,510 --> 00:48:50,079 theoretically understand what we see uh 1386 00:48:53,349 --> 00:48:51,520 observationally and we started to 1387 00:48:56,549 --> 00:48:53,359 understand it's its effect then on 1388 00:48:58,549 --> 00:48:56,559 planet formation and habitable planets 1389 00:48:59,910 --> 00:48:58,559 so very recently over the weekend we've 1390 00:49:00,710 --> 00:48:59,920 been doing runs 1391 00:49:04,230 --> 00:49:00,720 and 1392 00:49:05,510 --> 00:49:04,240 crude 1393 00:49:06,870 --> 00:49:05,520 assumption about what the gas 1394 00:49:08,150 --> 00:49:06,880 temperature is 1395 00:49:09,750 --> 00:49:08,160 in these discs 1396 00:49:11,990 --> 00:49:09,760 because we can't do the detailed 1397 00:49:13,510 --> 00:49:12,000 calculation but we've done the evolution 1398 00:49:15,190 --> 00:49:13,520 of the mass of the disc like i just 1399 00:49:16,950 --> 00:49:15,200 showed you the case for the one solar 1400 00:49:19,190 --> 00:49:16,960 mass star but we've done it around a 30 1401 00:49:20,069 --> 00:49:19,200 solar mass star and a 0.5 solar mass 1402 00:49:21,829 --> 00:49:20,079 star 1403 00:49:23,670 --> 00:49:21,839 and you can see that in the 30 solar 1404 00:49:25,750 --> 00:49:23,680 mass star you start off with a bigger 1405 00:49:27,190 --> 00:49:25,760 mass disc because more massive stars 1406 00:49:29,430 --> 00:49:27,200 tend to start off with a more massive 1407 00:49:31,589 --> 00:49:29,440 disc but because they have so much uv 1408 00:49:33,190 --> 00:49:31,599 they rapidly in in a few ten to the 1409 00:49:34,390 --> 00:49:33,200 fifth years go away 1410 00:49:35,510 --> 00:49:34,400 and i think it's even gonna be a little 1411 00:49:37,510 --> 00:49:35,520 shorter than this probably gonna be more 1412 00:49:39,270 --> 00:49:37,520 like one times ten to the fifth years 1413 00:49:41,750 --> 00:49:39,280 but uh when we do the detailed 1414 00:49:43,190 --> 00:49:41,760 calculation but it's very rapid so these 1415 00:49:44,630 --> 00:49:43,200 of course these stars don't last very 1416 00:49:45,670 --> 00:49:44,640 long but the discs really don't last 1417 00:49:47,349 --> 00:49:45,680 very long 1418 00:49:49,349 --> 00:49:47,359 and it's very unlikely places for 1419 00:49:51,510 --> 00:49:49,359 planets to form 1420 00:49:53,270 --> 00:49:51,520 if you go to lower mass stars than the 1421 00:49:54,790 --> 00:49:53,280 sun the interesting thing is is first of 1422 00:49:55,589 --> 00:49:54,800 all they start off with a lower mass 1423 00:49:57,510 --> 00:49:55,599 disc 1424 00:49:59,910 --> 00:49:57,520 secondly because their gravity holds the 1425 00:50:01,829 --> 00:49:59,920 disc less strongly we tend to get photo 1426 00:50:03,190 --> 00:50:01,839 evaporation happening more rapidly and 1427 00:50:05,109 --> 00:50:03,200 so they 1428 00:50:07,589 --> 00:50:05,119 more rapidly disappear too and they 1429 00:50:09,750 --> 00:50:07,599 start off with less mass so if you are 1430 00:50:11,270 --> 00:50:09,760 thinking that what planets need is to 1431 00:50:12,870 --> 00:50:11,280 have a lot of gas and dust for the 1432 00:50:15,270 --> 00:50:12,880 longest period of time or for them to 1433 00:50:17,109 --> 00:50:15,280 have time to form the planets then it 1434 00:50:18,870 --> 00:50:17,119 turns out that a solar mass car is a 1435 00:50:20,790 --> 00:50:18,880 kind of a good place because you can see 1436 00:50:23,190 --> 00:50:20,800 that there's more mass in the disk and 1437 00:50:25,829 --> 00:50:23,200 it lasts longer 1438 00:50:27,510 --> 00:50:25,839 or this this just integrate the amount 1439 00:50:29,589 --> 00:50:27,520 of mass and how long it lasts the one 1440 00:50:31,829 --> 00:50:29,599 solar mass star is the best and we think 1441 00:50:33,109 --> 00:50:31,839 the cutoff where where we really start 1442 00:50:34,630 --> 00:50:33,119 getting rapid 1443 00:50:36,870 --> 00:50:34,640 dispersion of the disc is probably 1444 00:50:38,630 --> 00:50:36,880 around five solar masses but we need 1445 00:50:42,150 --> 00:50:38,640 detailed models of the of the 1446 00:50:44,150 --> 00:50:42,160 temperature to really pinpoint that 1447 00:50:45,950 --> 00:50:44,160 so i'm going to conclude by summarizing 1448 00:50:48,470 --> 00:50:45,960 and telling what i think are the 1449 00:50:50,790 --> 00:50:48,480 astrobiological conclusions of this sort 1450 00:50:52,630 --> 00:50:50,800 of theoretical description of how we 1451 00:50:53,829 --> 00:50:52,640 think plants form and what kind of 1452 00:50:55,430 --> 00:50:53,839 environments are going to be good and 1453 00:50:56,870 --> 00:50:55,440 what kind of stellar masses are good for 1454 00:50:58,870 --> 00:50:56,880 plant information 1455 00:51:00,710 --> 00:50:58,880 so the summary is that photoevaporation 1456 00:51:02,470 --> 00:51:00,720 is the dominant dispersal mechanism for 1457 00:51:04,150 --> 00:51:02,480 the outer part of the disc beyond a few 1458 00:51:06,230 --> 00:51:04,160 astronomical units 1459 00:51:07,829 --> 00:51:06,240 viscous spreading and accretion dis is 1460 00:51:08,870 --> 00:51:07,839 what disperses the inner part of the 1461 00:51:10,710 --> 00:51:08,880 disc 1462 00:51:13,270 --> 00:51:10,720 the winds and stellar encounters play 1463 00:51:15,589 --> 00:51:13,280 little role in dispersal 1464 00:51:18,309 --> 00:51:15,599 the photo evaporation by the euv from 1465 00:51:20,710 --> 00:51:18,319 the central star oops sorry 1466 00:51:22,549 --> 00:51:20,720 creates a gap at a few au and then an 1467 00:51:24,150 --> 00:51:22,559 inner hole and then it rapidly photo 1468 00:51:25,510 --> 00:51:24,160 evaporates the outer torus from the 1469 00:51:28,309 --> 00:51:25,520 inside out 1470 00:51:30,309 --> 00:51:28,319 whereas photo evaporation by fuv or by 1471 00:51:32,630 --> 00:51:30,319 external star photo evaporates from the 1472 00:51:34,309 --> 00:51:32,640 outside in and it has a sharp outer edge 1473 00:51:36,069 --> 00:51:34,319 and it just evaporates from the outside 1474 00:51:37,670 --> 00:51:36,079 in 1475 00:51:39,750 --> 00:51:37,680 now if you take this 1476 00:51:42,710 --> 00:51:39,760 photo evaporation by the central star or 1477 00:51:45,430 --> 00:51:42,720 by a nearby massive star 1478 00:51:47,589 --> 00:51:45,440 and what we find is that it evaporates 1479 00:51:48,470 --> 00:51:47,599 the main mass reservoir of the disk so 1480 00:51:50,470 --> 00:51:48,480 this 1481 00:51:52,069 --> 00:51:50,480 process in conjunction with viscous 1482 00:51:53,910 --> 00:51:52,079 evolution determines their lifestyle 1483 00:51:55,430 --> 00:51:53,920 it's not just viscous evolution that 1484 00:51:57,750 --> 00:51:55,440 determines it it's the combination of 1485 00:51:59,829 --> 00:51:57,760 the photoevaporation and viscous that 1486 00:52:01,190 --> 00:51:59,839 determines how these discs evolve 1487 00:52:03,670 --> 00:52:01,200 in their in their gas and dust and 1488 00:52:06,069 --> 00:52:03,680 therefore how planets form 1489 00:52:07,750 --> 00:52:06,079 so i've tried to draw some astrobiology 1490 00:52:10,790 --> 00:52:07,760 conclusions from this i mean there's 1491 00:52:12,790 --> 00:52:10,800 some clear ones first of all 1492 00:52:14,309 --> 00:52:12,800 there are stars born near massive stars 1493 00:52:16,390 --> 00:52:14,319 that are going to just completely blow 1494 00:52:17,829 --> 00:52:16,400 away their discs the massive stars are 1495 00:52:20,390 --> 00:52:17,839 going to evaporate these discs fast and 1496 00:52:22,790 --> 00:52:20,400 we probably see this happening in orion 1497 00:52:25,190 --> 00:52:22,800 and so but we think in estimating what 1498 00:52:27,349 --> 00:52:25,200 fraction of solar type stars that that 1499 00:52:29,990 --> 00:52:27,359 do this is probably on the order of 5 to 1500 00:52:31,589 --> 00:52:30,000 30 percent so it's not a huge fraction 1501 00:52:32,950 --> 00:52:31,599 but there is going to be some discs that 1502 00:52:35,109 --> 00:52:32,960 are going to be compromised the planet 1503 00:52:37,190 --> 00:52:35,119 formation compromised 1504 00:52:39,510 --> 00:52:37,200 stars more massive than about five solar 1505 00:52:40,790 --> 00:52:39,520 masses don't need an external star to do 1506 00:52:42,069 --> 00:52:40,800 damage they're going to damage 1507 00:52:43,510 --> 00:52:42,079 themselves they're going to 1508 00:52:45,109 --> 00:52:43,520 self-destruct 1509 00:52:46,710 --> 00:52:45,119 and they'll lose their discs in less 1510 00:52:48,549 --> 00:52:46,720 than a million years and make it 1511 00:52:52,069 --> 00:52:48,559 difficult for for planets to form 1512 00:52:53,829 --> 00:52:52,079 particularly gas giant planets 1513 00:52:56,470 --> 00:52:53,839 and then the photo evaporation by the 1514 00:52:58,549 --> 00:52:56,480 central star may lead to a peak in the 1515 00:53:02,150 --> 00:52:58,559 disk mass in lifetime first or disks 1516 00:53:04,470 --> 00:53:02,160 around roughly one silver mass stars 1517 00:53:07,510 --> 00:53:04,480 that this may be the best place 1518 00:53:09,430 --> 00:53:07,520 for for uh for habitable planets to form 1519 00:53:11,030 --> 00:53:09,440 because the discs have the most time to 1520 00:53:12,950 --> 00:53:11,040 form the planets 1521 00:53:15,990 --> 00:53:12,960 and the and we've seen that in these 1522 00:53:18,309 --> 00:53:16,000 models that we rarely we never uh have 1523 00:53:22,230 --> 00:53:18,319 seen that we could keep 10 to the minus 1524 00:53:23,990 --> 00:53:22,240 two jupiter masses of gas lasting for um 1525 00:53:25,910 --> 00:53:24,000 uh tens of millions of years which would 1526 00:53:28,710 --> 00:53:25,920 then circularize the planet the orbits 1527 00:53:30,549 --> 00:53:28,720 of the earth size or the of lunar-sized 1528 00:53:33,270 --> 00:53:30,559 planets and prevent them from forming 1529 00:53:35,510 --> 00:53:33,280 earth-sized planets 1530 00:53:37,589 --> 00:53:35,520 so i i wanted to sort of finish on some 1531 00:53:39,430 --> 00:53:37,599 caveats though remember that 1532 00:53:40,870 --> 00:53:39,440 for this that lose their mass in less 1533 00:53:43,349 --> 00:53:40,880 than three million years which is what 1534 00:53:44,870 --> 00:53:43,359 i've been focusing on by this process of 1535 00:53:47,030 --> 00:53:44,880 photo evaporation 1536 00:53:48,790 --> 00:53:47,040 in with viscous evolution 1537 00:53:50,790 --> 00:53:48,800 certainly giant plant formation is 1538 00:53:52,630 --> 00:53:50,800 suppressed if it's if it's caused by 1539 00:53:54,230 --> 00:53:52,640 core accretion which 1540 00:53:56,950 --> 00:53:54,240 many of us think is the dominant way to 1541 00:53:59,109 --> 00:53:56,960 make gas giants so 1542 00:54:01,910 --> 00:53:59,119 giant plants are likely to be suppressed 1543 00:54:03,430 --> 00:54:01,920 now they may have an effect on uh on the 1544 00:54:04,790 --> 00:54:03,440 likelihood of life we know i mean 1545 00:54:05,990 --> 00:54:04,800 because we know that for example in the 1546 00:54:08,309 --> 00:54:06,000 earth system 1547 00:54:09,670 --> 00:54:08,319 jupiter has a protective effect dave 1548 00:54:11,430 --> 00:54:09,680 morrison is actually an audience so i 1549 00:54:14,069 --> 00:54:11,440 can check with him but i think it 1550 00:54:16,309 --> 00:54:14,079 protects us from uh from a too high a 1551 00:54:19,589 --> 00:54:16,319 bombardment by the kuiper belt objects 1552 00:54:21,589 --> 00:54:19,599 and by objects that form comets uh 1553 00:54:23,109 --> 00:54:21,599 that the giant planets have a protective 1554 00:54:25,030 --> 00:54:23,119 effect that way we might get bombarded 1555 00:54:26,470 --> 00:54:25,040 too rapidly 1556 00:54:28,630 --> 00:54:26,480 if we didn't have 1557 00:54:29,510 --> 00:54:28,640 jupiter there 1558 00:54:30,710 --> 00:54:29,520 now 1559 00:54:32,950 --> 00:54:30,720 okay so 1560 00:54:34,309 --> 00:54:32,960 these giant plants then may have some 1561 00:54:36,549 --> 00:54:34,319 effect on the habitability of 1562 00:54:38,309 --> 00:54:36,559 terrestrial planets and uh and what 1563 00:54:40,710 --> 00:54:38,319 we're see and of course if we're talking 1564 00:54:42,230 --> 00:54:40,720 about moons around giant planets then uh 1565 00:54:43,910 --> 00:54:42,240 they're they're uh 1566 00:54:46,069 --> 00:54:43,920 the giant planet will be suppressed in 1567 00:54:48,470 --> 00:54:46,079 these cases uh we're talking about 1568 00:54:51,589 --> 00:54:48,480 habitable life forming around moons 1569 00:54:53,349 --> 00:54:51,599 now less certain uh is how is the comets 1570 00:54:55,270 --> 00:54:53,359 themselves or the kuiper belt objects 1571 00:54:57,670 --> 00:54:55,280 themselves that form comets that have 1572 00:54:59,829 --> 00:54:57,680 all these ice and and volatile rich 1573 00:55:02,230 --> 00:54:59,839 material they may be suppressed because 1574 00:55:03,910 --> 00:55:02,240 you see that we rap and very rapidly get 1575 00:55:06,470 --> 00:55:03,920 rid of this outer material and so if we 1576 00:55:08,710 --> 00:55:06,480 can get rid of the dust faster than it 1577 00:55:10,630 --> 00:55:08,720 can coagulate into big enough sizes and 1578 00:55:12,150 --> 00:55:10,640 by big enough sizes i mean you know 1579 00:55:14,950 --> 00:55:12,160 things that are centimeters are bigger 1580 00:55:18,309 --> 00:55:14,960 in size if it can happen faster than 1581 00:55:19,270 --> 00:55:18,319 that then it won't form uh these comets 1582 00:55:21,030 --> 00:55:19,280 these uh 1583 00:55:22,870 --> 00:55:21,040 kuiper belt objects 1584 00:55:24,549 --> 00:55:22,880 but terrestrial planet formation help 1585 00:55:27,109 --> 00:55:24,559 may not be suppressed even in those 1586 00:55:28,870 --> 00:55:27,119 cases where we we disperse the disc in 1587 00:55:31,270 --> 00:55:28,880 say a million years because this 1588 00:55:33,510 --> 00:55:31,280 coagulation at 1au of the of the dust 1589 00:55:34,630 --> 00:55:33,520 particles sizes big big enough to form 1590 00:55:37,109 --> 00:55:34,640 rocks 1591 00:55:39,990 --> 00:55:37,119 is very rapid we think and so even if 1592 00:55:41,990 --> 00:55:40,000 the gas got evaporated in in a few times 1593 00:55:43,750 --> 00:55:42,000 the fifth years there may be rocks left 1594 00:55:45,190 --> 00:55:43,760 which then can slowly build up a 1595 00:55:47,990 --> 00:55:45,200 terrestrial earth 1596 00:55:49,750 --> 00:55:48,000 so that so we may have a class of system 1597 00:55:51,030 --> 00:55:49,760 where there's a class of stars where 1598 00:55:52,789 --> 00:55:51,040 they have terrestrial planets but they 1599 00:55:55,190 --> 00:55:52,799 don't have giant planets and possibly no 1600 00:55:57,829 --> 00:55:55,200 kuiper belts uh it's impossible 1601 00:55:59,670 --> 00:55:57,839 so i'll leave you with that thought uh 1602 00:56:00,829 --> 00:55:59,680 and conclude and ask for questions if 1603 00:56:06,630 --> 00:56:00,839 there are some 1604 00:56:12,309 --> 00:56:09,030 okay if you have questions please raise 1605 00:56:15,190 --> 00:56:12,319 your hand on webex and i'll take 1606 00:56:17,910 --> 00:56:15,200 advantage of hosting over here to start 1607 00:56:19,750 --> 00:56:17,920 off the questioning uh dave 1608 00:56:24,870 --> 00:56:19,760 if 1609 00:56:26,789 --> 00:56:24,880 long enough to circularize orbits of 1610 00:56:28,630 --> 00:56:26,799 terrestrial planets how do you get 1611 00:56:30,950 --> 00:56:28,640 circular orbits 1612 00:56:34,230 --> 00:56:30,960 in a solar system like ours 1613 00:56:38,870 --> 00:56:35,829 yeah i have to say that it's a matter of 1614 00:56:41,109 --> 00:56:38,880 degree that the models that uh don't 1615 00:56:43,270 --> 00:56:41,119 have gas in them uh and and don't have 1616 00:56:44,470 --> 00:56:43,280 any anything else to circularize the 1617 00:56:47,910 --> 00:56:44,480 orbits 1618 00:56:49,990 --> 00:56:47,920 that elliptical but they are more 1619 00:56:52,150 --> 00:56:50,000 elliptical than the earth is i mean i'll 1620 00:56:54,069 --> 00:56:52,160 say that so they're the so there has 1621 00:56:55,670 --> 00:56:54,079 been when they do these models where the 1622 00:56:57,990 --> 00:56:55,680 the sort of the moons crash into each 1623 00:56:59,750 --> 00:56:58,000 other and so forth you end up with a an 1624 00:57:01,270 --> 00:56:59,760 earth that's on a somewhat elliptical 1625 00:57:03,349 --> 00:57:01,280 orbit it's pretty circular but it is 1626 00:57:06,150 --> 00:57:03,359 elliptical and it's more elliptical than 1627 00:57:08,549 --> 00:57:06,160 the earth is observed to orbit so 1628 00:57:10,309 --> 00:57:08,559 there's been this was a this mechanism 1629 00:57:12,150 --> 00:57:10,319 the gas was an attempt to actually 1630 00:57:14,069 --> 00:57:12,160 explain that uh was an attempt to say 1631 00:57:16,710 --> 00:57:14,079 well what then did circularize the earth 1632 00:57:19,190 --> 00:57:16,720 to the to the almost exact circle that 1633 00:57:21,750 --> 00:57:19,200 we're in uh and it would it was intense 1634 00:57:23,430 --> 00:57:21,760 and i i think that these models seem to 1635 00:57:25,030 --> 00:57:23,440 indicate that that probably won't work 1636 00:57:27,349 --> 00:57:25,040 and so we need something else another 1637 00:57:29,430 --> 00:57:27,359 suggestion is that if you have if when 1638 00:57:31,430 --> 00:57:29,440 the earth formed there's a lot of small 1639 00:57:33,829 --> 00:57:31,440 rocky objects around they can have the 1640 00:57:35,190 --> 00:57:33,839 same kind of effect they can produce 1641 00:57:36,630 --> 00:57:35,200 this sort of dynamic but you need a 1642 00:57:38,230 --> 00:57:36,640 fairly high mass of these things you 1643 00:57:39,910 --> 00:57:38,240 need something that's comparable to the 1644 00:57:40,950 --> 00:57:39,920 earth mass in order to 1645 00:57:42,309 --> 00:57:40,960 are bigger than the earth somewhat 1646 00:57:44,390 --> 00:57:42,319 bigger than the earth mass in order to 1647 00:57:47,349 --> 00:57:44,400 circularize here so maybe it's 1648 00:57:48,470 --> 00:57:47,359 it's uh it's not gas it's it's objects 1649 00:57:50,309 --> 00:57:48,480 that are 1650 00:57:53,270 --> 00:57:50,319 you know rocks or moon or you know 1651 00:57:56,069 --> 00:57:53,280 smaller size things that circularize it 1652 00:57:57,829 --> 00:57:56,079 thank you i see we have at least one 1653 00:58:00,150 --> 00:57:57,839 hand raised on webex so i'll turn over 1654 00:58:01,910 --> 00:58:00,160 to marco 1655 00:58:04,950 --> 00:58:01,920 um 1656 00:58:07,510 --> 00:58:06,309 okay 1657 00:58:08,789 --> 00:58:07,520 thank you 1658 00:58:11,510 --> 00:58:08,799 hi 1659 00:58:13,829 --> 00:58:11,520 very nice talk great uh i have a few 1660 00:58:16,470 --> 00:58:13,839 questions i'm not sure if i have the 1661 00:58:19,750 --> 00:58:16,480 time to ask all of them but 1662 00:58:23,109 --> 00:58:19,760 let me ask you two first uh this is a 1663 00:58:26,230 --> 00:58:23,119 probably technical point so uh 1664 00:58:29,270 --> 00:58:26,240 you said that a one a gap is formed by 1665 00:58:30,390 --> 00:58:29,280 the uv photon evaporation of the inside 1666 00:58:31,670 --> 00:58:30,400 of the 1667 00:58:34,950 --> 00:58:31,680 disc then 1668 00:58:37,109 --> 00:58:34,960 mass will flow inside from some uh 1669 00:58:40,230 --> 00:58:37,119 perhaps the 1670 00:58:42,309 --> 00:58:40,240 most massive location but does the same 1671 00:58:45,190 --> 00:58:42,319 thing happen when the 1672 00:58:46,470 --> 00:58:45,200 fuv photons evaporate the outside part 1673 00:58:49,670 --> 00:58:46,480 of the disk 1674 00:58:51,430 --> 00:58:49,680 that mass will flow outside outward 1675 00:58:53,109 --> 00:58:51,440 does that occur 1676 00:58:53,910 --> 00:58:53,119 yes it does uh 1677 00:58:54,950 --> 00:58:53,920 the 1678 00:58:56,309 --> 00:58:54,960 is that 1679 00:58:58,309 --> 00:58:56,319 in fact 1680 00:59:01,190 --> 00:58:58,319 what happens in the in the cases that i 1681 00:59:02,870 --> 00:59:01,200 showed with the combination of say the 1682 00:59:04,789 --> 00:59:02,880 fuv photons which are heating the outer 1683 00:59:07,109 --> 00:59:04,799 part of the disc and viscous evolution 1684 00:59:08,710 --> 00:59:07,119 what's going on is a competition between 1685 00:59:10,470 --> 00:59:08,720 the viscous accretion is trying to 1686 00:59:12,150 --> 00:59:10,480 spread the disc out further but then 1687 00:59:13,750 --> 00:59:12,160 evaporation is trying to truncate it and 1688 00:59:15,910 --> 00:59:13,760 so you sort of reach a kind of a 1689 00:59:17,670 --> 00:59:15,920 quasi-steady-state 1690 00:59:19,430 --> 00:59:17,680 distribution of surface density such 1691 00:59:21,510 --> 00:59:19,440 that the viscous evolution is pushing 1692 00:59:23,190 --> 00:59:21,520 things out and then the uh the photo 1693 00:59:25,349 --> 00:59:23,200 evaporation is driving things in and so 1694 00:59:27,030 --> 00:59:25,359 that the solutions you saw sort of 1695 00:59:28,710 --> 00:59:27,040 reflect that tension between the two 1696 00:59:29,910 --> 00:59:28,720 processes 1697 00:59:32,549 --> 00:59:29,920 great thank you 1698 00:59:34,470 --> 00:59:32,559 the other part where the gap is uh yeah 1699 00:59:36,390 --> 00:59:34,480 it's just that the once the gap forms 1700 00:59:37,190 --> 00:59:36,400 due to the euv photons 1701 00:59:39,510 --> 00:59:37,200 then 1702 00:59:41,910 --> 00:59:39,520 the inside no longer is getting the the 1703 00:59:43,829 --> 00:59:41,920 outside can't accrete onto to replace 1704 00:59:45,750 --> 00:59:43,839 the inside because there's this gap and 1705 00:59:47,829 --> 00:59:45,760 because everything that comes in is 1706 00:59:50,069 --> 00:59:47,839 being evaporated by the euv photons at 1707 00:59:52,230 --> 00:59:50,079 that gap and so nothing is replenishing 1708 00:59:54,309 --> 00:59:52,240 the inside so when the inside doesn't 1709 00:59:55,910 --> 00:59:54,319 have a outside source to replenish it it 1710 00:59:57,829 --> 00:59:55,920 very rapidly just decreases onto the 1711 01:00:00,309 --> 00:59:57,839 central star 1712 01:00:01,750 --> 01:00:00,319 great and uh in one of your slides i 1713 01:00:03,910 --> 01:00:01,760 think it's a 1714 01:00:07,190 --> 01:00:03,920 very new result continue 1715 01:00:09,510 --> 01:00:07,200 probably uh has a six uh but basically 1716 01:00:13,510 --> 01:00:09,520 what i want to ask is uh in though all 1717 01:00:15,670 --> 01:00:13,520 those figures uh ua for fuv 1718 01:00:18,549 --> 01:00:15,680 those are only considering the 1719 01:00:21,270 --> 01:00:18,559 contribution from the central star not 1720 01:00:23,430 --> 01:00:21,280 the external star is that correct 1721 01:00:25,510 --> 01:00:23,440 yes i i think i don't know if you can 1722 01:00:27,030 --> 01:00:25,520 see my view graphs but yeah although 1723 01:00:29,349 --> 01:00:27,040 very new results 1724 01:00:30,789 --> 01:00:29,359 yeah that yes what happened uh 1725 01:00:32,630 --> 01:00:30,799 historically was that i worked on the 1726 01:00:35,349 --> 01:00:32,640 external stars first and so the newer 1727 01:00:37,109 --> 01:00:35,359 results are the internal stars in some 1728 01:00:38,309 --> 01:00:37,119 sense the external stars are simpler 1729 01:00:40,309 --> 01:00:38,319 case uh 1730 01:00:42,390 --> 01:00:40,319 because the um 1731 01:00:44,549 --> 01:00:42,400 the radius well it's just 1732 01:00:47,589 --> 01:00:44,559 the problem with the the central star is 1733 01:00:49,270 --> 01:00:47,599 that the disc flares in response to this 1734 01:00:50,950 --> 01:00:49,280 heating of the surface and then the 1735 01:00:53,109 --> 01:00:50,960 radius of transfer to calculate the 1736 01:00:54,309 --> 01:00:53,119 heating depends on all your solutions on 1737 01:00:55,670 --> 01:00:54,319 the inside 1738 01:00:57,190 --> 01:00:55,680 and how the how the photons from the 1739 01:00:58,630 --> 01:00:57,200 central star can make it through the 1740 01:01:00,309 --> 01:00:58,640 inner part of the disc out to the outer 1741 01:01:01,589 --> 01:01:00,319 part of the disc and so it's it's more 1742 01:01:02,470 --> 01:01:01,599 complicated when you have an external 1743 01:01:03,589 --> 01:01:02,480 star 1744 01:01:05,910 --> 01:01:03,599 basically 1745 01:01:07,829 --> 01:01:05,920 what the the most of the photons are 1746 01:01:09,349 --> 01:01:07,839 evaporating the outside rim of the star 1747 01:01:10,950 --> 01:01:09,359 first and then working their way inward 1748 01:01:12,950 --> 01:01:10,960 and there isn't this complicated uh 1749 01:01:15,589 --> 01:01:12,960 treatment of the rate of transfer of the 1750 01:01:17,270 --> 01:01:15,599 photons going in yes all these were just 1751 01:01:18,789 --> 01:01:17,280 from the central star at the end here 1752 01:01:21,109 --> 01:01:18,799 yeah 1753 01:01:22,230 --> 01:01:21,119 do you always assume that the disk mass 1754 01:01:23,109 --> 01:01:22,240 is a 1755 01:01:25,109 --> 01:01:23,119 10 1756 01:01:27,109 --> 01:01:25,119 of the star mass 1757 01:01:28,230 --> 01:01:27,119 no we can vary that the reason that i 1758 01:01:29,589 --> 01:01:28,240 chose that 1759 01:01:31,190 --> 01:01:29,599 was that based on the sort of 1760 01:01:32,390 --> 01:01:31,200 theoretical idea 1761 01:01:35,190 --> 01:01:32,400 that 1762 01:01:37,190 --> 01:01:35,200 uh in the initial formation of the disc 1763 01:01:39,589 --> 01:01:37,200 the disc mass builds up until it becomes 1764 01:01:41,270 --> 01:01:39,599 gravitationally unstable so it's hard to 1765 01:01:42,950 --> 01:01:41,280 get it more massive than point one of 1766 01:01:45,190 --> 01:01:42,960 the stellar mass because then it really 1767 01:01:47,270 --> 01:01:45,200 gets violently gravitationally unstable 1768 01:01:50,230 --> 01:01:47,280 and it starts to really rapidly either 1769 01:01:51,990 --> 01:01:50,240 form a binary or or a creed onto the 1770 01:01:53,030 --> 01:01:52,000 central star and actually the first 1771 01:01:54,549 --> 01:01:53,040 thing that happens is it starts to 1772 01:01:55,510 --> 01:01:54,559 really accrete rapidly under the central 1773 01:01:59,349 --> 01:01:55,520 star 1774 01:02:00,870 --> 01:01:59,359 that idea is that's a threshold just 1775 01:02:03,589 --> 01:02:00,880 where you start to get gravitationally 1776 01:02:06,870 --> 01:02:03,599 unstable and it's a roughly 0.1 solar 1777 01:02:08,470 --> 01:02:06,880 masses it can be a little more or less 1778 01:02:10,230 --> 01:02:08,480 but we can in our models of course we 1779 01:02:11,589 --> 01:02:10,240 can start with any mass we want if we 1780 01:02:13,270 --> 01:02:11,599 start with lower masses then we get 1781 01:02:14,309 --> 01:02:13,280 shorter time speeds 1782 01:02:17,270 --> 01:02:14,319 okay 1783 01:02:18,710 --> 01:02:17,280 dave dave let me ask a different sort of 1784 01:02:22,069 --> 01:02:18,720 question 1785 01:02:24,549 --> 01:02:22,079 we often hear of planetary rings being 1786 01:02:26,870 --> 01:02:24,559 proposed as analogs for protoplanetary 1787 01:02:28,390 --> 01:02:26,880 disks in particular saturn's rings and 1788 01:02:30,789 --> 01:02:28,400 of course there's been a lot of study 1789 01:02:32,230 --> 01:02:30,799 from the cassini mission in particular 1790 01:02:35,270 --> 01:02:32,240 of uh 1791 01:02:38,230 --> 01:02:35,280 gravity waves etc and other features in 1792 01:02:40,549 --> 01:02:38,240 saturn's rings to what degree 1793 01:02:42,470 --> 01:02:40,559 are planetary rings and saturn's rings 1794 01:02:44,710 --> 01:02:42,480 in particular a good analog for 1795 01:02:46,549 --> 01:02:44,720 protoplanetary disks and to what degree 1796 01:02:50,230 --> 01:02:46,559 would we expect to see 1797 01:02:51,910 --> 01:02:50,240 the same kind of physical phenomena in a 1798 01:02:55,430 --> 01:02:51,920 protoplanetary disk that we see in 1799 01:03:00,390 --> 01:02:58,549 question um well of course 1800 01:03:02,710 --> 01:03:00,400 a big difference in compared with these 1801 01:03:04,069 --> 01:03:02,720 models is that if you have the rings 1802 01:03:05,030 --> 01:03:04,079 around saturn 1803 01:03:07,589 --> 01:03:05,040 the thing that's going to photo 1804 01:03:10,549 --> 01:03:07,599 evaporate them will probably be the sun 1805 01:03:12,870 --> 01:03:10,559 and so then the question is uh you know 1806 01:03:14,789 --> 01:03:12,880 at what point does the stellar photons 1807 01:03:16,549 --> 01:03:14,799 make it to saturn's rings i mean if 1808 01:03:18,470 --> 01:03:16,559 saturn formed and the rings are starting 1809 01:03:20,950 --> 01:03:18,480 to form in a situation where you still 1810 01:03:22,710 --> 01:03:20,960 have a gas disc presence and dust disk 1811 01:03:24,549 --> 01:03:22,720 then the stellar photons 1812 01:03:26,150 --> 01:03:24,559 won't make it in 1813 01:03:28,309 --> 01:03:26,160 there they're sort of analogous in the 1814 01:03:30,549 --> 01:03:28,319 sense that it's true that in these rings 1815 01:03:32,549 --> 01:03:30,559 there's the same processes of 1816 01:03:33,829 --> 01:03:32,559 of coagulation of particles you know 1817 01:03:35,990 --> 01:03:33,839 sort of settling 1818 01:03:38,309 --> 01:03:36,000 to the midplane and the coagulation of 1819 01:03:40,470 --> 01:03:38,319 particles so that that part of it is is 1820 01:03:47,750 --> 01:03:40,480 similar 1821 01:03:51,670 --> 01:03:49,750 yeah i mean saturn's rings in the in the 1822 01:03:53,829 --> 01:03:51,680 in the planet system there's been time 1823 01:03:55,670 --> 01:03:53,839 enough so that there's been a kind of a 1824 01:03:57,829 --> 01:03:55,680 sweeping out there's there's a growth of 1825 01:03:59,589 --> 01:03:57,839 these particles to the point where they 1826 01:04:01,029 --> 01:03:59,599 actually get gravitationally important 1827 01:04:02,870 --> 01:04:01,039 and they start to sort of focus other 1828 01:04:05,109 --> 01:04:02,880 particles in saturn's rings everything 1829 01:04:06,470 --> 01:04:05,119 is small still and so there isn't any of 1830 01:04:10,470 --> 01:04:06,480 this and there isn't just sweeping up so 1831 01:04:13,109 --> 01:04:11,589 you know it's a good question i haven't 1832 01:04:14,069 --> 01:04:13,119 really thought about it that much but 1833 01:04:15,430 --> 01:04:14,079 the uh 1834 01:04:17,670 --> 01:04:15,440 um 1835 01:04:20,069 --> 01:04:17,680 uh you know it's certainly possible that 1836 01:04:22,870 --> 01:04:20,079 in the formation of the rings around the 1837 01:04:25,109 --> 01:04:22,880 the planets that uh photo evaporation by 1838 01:04:27,349 --> 01:04:25,119 the by the sun may have played a role in 1839 01:04:28,789 --> 01:04:27,359 affecting the evolution of these rings 1840 01:04:30,069 --> 01:04:28,799 if they if they 1841 01:04:33,190 --> 01:04:30,079 if they didn't 1842 01:04:34,549 --> 01:04:33,200 get exposed to the solar radiation 1843 01:04:36,309 --> 01:04:34,559 thanks 1844 01:04:37,750 --> 01:04:36,319 we have a question from the ames team 1845 01:04:39,670 --> 01:04:37,760 okay 1846 01:04:41,430 --> 01:04:39,680 and then from 1847 01:04:42,870 --> 01:04:41,440 this is dave dimare i have a just wonder 1848 01:04:44,870 --> 01:04:42,880 if you can make some comment about 1849 01:04:46,390 --> 01:04:44,880 volatiles in the in the context of this 1850 01:04:48,230 --> 01:04:46,400 and i'm thinking about that that poor 1851 01:04:50,069 --> 01:04:48,240 oort cloud out there which that sounds 1852 01:04:52,390 --> 01:04:50,079 like a pretty brutal place to be based 1853 01:04:55,029 --> 01:04:52,400 on your evaporation models and then also 1854 01:04:56,549 --> 01:04:55,039 just what the impact of your models have 1855 01:04:57,670 --> 01:04:56,559 on the delivery of volatiles to the 1856 01:04:59,270 --> 01:04:57,680 earth i mean 1857 01:05:01,510 --> 01:04:59,280 it seems like many people think that 1858 01:05:03,109 --> 01:05:01,520 this is a later stage kind of thing and 1859 01:05:04,390 --> 01:05:03,119 it sounds pretty brutal in the later 1860 01:05:05,990 --> 01:05:04,400 stages of your model so i was just 1861 01:05:08,470 --> 01:05:06,000 wondering if you could comment about 1862 01:05:10,630 --> 01:05:08,480 where our volatiles end up 1863 01:05:12,870 --> 01:05:10,640 okay um well the art cloud you know is 1864 01:05:14,630 --> 01:05:12,880 supposed to originate actually from 1865 01:05:16,230 --> 01:05:14,640 material that formed 1866 01:05:18,630 --> 01:05:16,240 probably uh 1867 01:05:20,230 --> 01:05:18,640 you know around neptune or 1868 01:05:21,910 --> 01:05:20,240 and so 1869 01:05:23,430 --> 01:05:21,920 it's true that the art cloud's way out 1870 01:05:25,029 --> 01:05:23,440 there now and that seems like a very 1871 01:05:26,549 --> 01:05:25,039 brutal place in terms of this photo 1872 01:05:29,190 --> 01:05:26,559 evaporation model where things on the 1873 01:05:31,029 --> 01:05:29,200 outside happen very rapidly but i think 1874 01:05:34,309 --> 01:05:31,039 the art cloud is the sort of ejecta 1875 01:05:35,910 --> 01:05:34,319 material that formed in closer at say 1876 01:05:36,870 --> 01:05:35,920 tens of au 1877 01:05:37,750 --> 01:05:36,880 and so 1878 01:05:38,549 --> 01:05:37,760 uh 1879 01:05:44,710 --> 01:05:38,559 the 1880 01:05:47,029 --> 01:05:44,720 that are probably kilometers in size or 1881 01:05:48,710 --> 01:05:47,039 are bigger or hundreds it could be up to 1882 01:05:50,390 --> 01:05:48,720 100 kilometers in size but you know 1883 01:05:51,109 --> 01:05:50,400 things of that size 1884 01:05:53,349 --> 01:05:51,119 and 1885 01:05:54,230 --> 01:05:53,359 if you can just form the 1886 01:05:58,710 --> 01:05:54,240 if 1887 01:06:00,230 --> 01:05:58,720 rock icy rocks 1888 01:06:02,069 --> 01:06:00,240 big enough so that they'll withstand 1889 01:06:04,069 --> 01:06:02,079 this evaporation and then they can 1890 01:06:05,750 --> 01:06:04,079 eventually coagulate into the objects 1891 01:06:08,230 --> 01:06:05,760 that form comets so the question really 1892 01:06:11,029 --> 01:06:08,240 is is can you evaporate faster than the 1893 01:06:12,309 --> 01:06:11,039 material can coagulate into bodies that 1894 01:06:15,910 --> 01:06:12,319 are big enough to withstand the 1895 01:06:18,309 --> 01:06:15,920 evaporation and that i'm not so sure of 1896 01:06:20,069 --> 01:06:18,319 because this time scales for coagulation 1897 01:06:22,789 --> 01:06:20,079 of these particles building up to sort 1898 01:06:25,510 --> 01:06:22,799 of uh centimeters or meters in size is 1899 01:06:28,069 --> 01:06:25,520 not so clearly understood yet uh 1900 01:06:29,990 --> 01:06:28,079 coagulation is sort of a dicey topic 1901 01:06:32,710 --> 01:06:30,000 so it's possible that's why i sort of 1902 01:06:34,230 --> 01:06:32,720 i'm a little waffling on this uh this 1903 01:06:36,150 --> 01:06:34,240 when i've mentioned these fiber belts 1904 01:06:38,150 --> 01:06:36,160 that they may be suppressed but i'm not 1905 01:06:40,549 --> 01:06:38,160 sure it just depends on how long the 1906 01:06:42,150 --> 01:06:40,559 coagulation process takes to get them 1907 01:06:44,069 --> 01:06:42,160 big enough to withstand 1908 01:06:45,430 --> 01:06:44,079 things that tends of a you 1909 01:06:48,549 --> 01:06:45,440 because the photo evaporation is going 1910 01:06:50,789 --> 01:06:48,559 to remove all the small icy bodies and 1911 01:06:53,109 --> 01:06:50,799 you know less than a millimeter in size 1912 01:06:54,950 --> 01:06:53,119 and the gas you know in and as you see 1913 01:06:56,710 --> 01:06:54,960 in time scales can be time scales of 1914 01:06:58,710 --> 01:06:56,720 less than a million years 1915 01:07:01,029 --> 01:06:58,720 and the coagulation time scales in the 1916 01:07:03,270 --> 01:07:01,039 in the solar nebula get bigger longer as 1917 01:07:04,950 --> 01:07:03,280 you go out and so there's a point where 1918 01:07:06,870 --> 01:07:04,960 the coagulation time skills just even to 1919 01:07:08,630 --> 01:07:06,880 build up a millimeter size particle gets 1920 01:07:10,549 --> 01:07:08,640 to be pretty long 1921 01:07:12,789 --> 01:07:10,559 and at that point you will just truncate 1922 01:07:14,789 --> 01:07:12,799 the ability to form any kind of ice 1923 01:07:16,150 --> 01:07:14,799 now i know that there's been a lot of 1924 01:07:18,789 --> 01:07:16,160 work done on what's delivering the 1925 01:07:20,950 --> 01:07:18,799 volatiles to the earth and the one 1926 01:07:22,789 --> 01:07:20,960 i think the lead author was morbidelli 1927 01:07:24,630 --> 01:07:22,799 but 1928 01:07:26,470 --> 01:07:24,640 talked about the reservoir maybe from 1929 01:07:28,390 --> 01:07:26,480 the asteroid belt with some sort of 1930 01:07:29,750 --> 01:07:28,400 water-rich objects in the asteroid belt 1931 01:07:30,789 --> 01:07:29,760 which is sort of you know inside of 1932 01:07:33,589 --> 01:07:30,799 jupiter 1933 01:07:35,750 --> 01:07:33,599 and those regions 1934 01:07:37,589 --> 01:07:35,760 again are fairly close in 1935 01:07:39,109 --> 01:07:37,599 and they're subject to this 1936 01:07:40,710 --> 01:07:39,119 i mean in these models where you have 1937 01:07:42,870 --> 01:07:40,720 the photo evaporation combining with 1938 01:07:44,230 --> 01:07:42,880 viscous evolution eventually the viscous 1939 01:07:46,470 --> 01:07:44,240 evolution does get rid of that inner 1940 01:07:48,470 --> 01:07:46,480 part of the gas and the dust but that 1941 01:07:50,549 --> 01:07:48,480 does take typically takes millions of 1942 01:07:53,109 --> 01:07:50,559 years and presumably there would be time 1943 01:07:54,230 --> 01:07:53,119 to form some of those objects uh 1944 01:07:56,230 --> 01:07:54,240 so i 1945 01:07:59,829 --> 01:07:56,240 i think that in terms of the just to 1946 01:08:02,630 --> 01:07:59,839 summarize my guess is that 1947 01:08:05,109 --> 01:08:02,640 in the extreme cases where you evaporate 1948 01:08:06,789 --> 01:08:05,119 the whole discs are evaporated in like 1949 01:08:08,630 --> 01:08:06,799 less than a million years and maybe even 1950 01:08:10,390 --> 01:08:08,640 less than 10 or 50 years like an extreme 1951 01:08:12,309 --> 01:08:10,400 case of a disk around a very high 1952 01:08:13,750 --> 01:08:12,319 massive star or a low mass star very 1953 01:08:15,990 --> 01:08:13,760 close to inestar 1954 01:08:18,550 --> 01:08:16,000 then you may affect the volatiles but uh 1955 01:08:20,309 --> 01:08:18,560 in a case where the discs take a like in 1956 01:08:22,229 --> 01:08:20,319 the sun's case it just takes you 1957 01:08:26,149 --> 01:08:22,239 millions of years to evaporate then i 1958 01:08:32,550 --> 01:08:28,070 dave 1959 01:08:34,470 --> 01:08:32,560 over my head in many ways but i'm going 1960 01:08:35,990 --> 01:08:34,480 to try to give you a hard time in any 1961 01:08:39,189 --> 01:08:36,000 case 1962 01:08:41,030 --> 01:08:39,199 because of the element that that you 1963 01:08:43,189 --> 01:08:41,040 that after the disc has largely 1964 01:08:44,550 --> 01:08:43,199 dissipated i had the impression you were 1965 01:08:47,189 --> 01:08:44,560 talking about the 1966 01:08:49,749 --> 01:08:47,199 the planetesimals kind of automatically 1967 01:08:51,829 --> 01:08:49,759 coming together and surely that depends 1968 01:08:54,229 --> 01:08:51,839 on whether or not there is a giant 1969 01:08:56,709 --> 01:08:54,239 planet like jupiter but just as today 1970 01:08:58,870 --> 01:08:56,719 the stability of objects in the asteroid 1971 01:09:01,669 --> 01:08:58,880 belt depends on jupiter and i'm just 1972 01:09:03,910 --> 01:09:01,679 curious about about that that role i 1973 01:09:07,110 --> 01:09:03,920 surely you cannot completely decouple 1974 01:09:08,789 --> 01:09:07,120 the presence of external giant planets 1975 01:09:10,630 --> 01:09:08,799 from what's happening in the terrestrial 1976 01:09:11,590 --> 01:09:10,640 realm inside 1977 01:09:13,269 --> 01:09:11,600 right 1978 01:09:15,430 --> 01:09:13,279 and that's a that's a really good point 1979 01:09:17,430 --> 01:09:15,440 and i should that's one that uh i would 1980 01:09:20,309 --> 01:09:17,440 like to understand further because 1981 01:09:22,070 --> 01:09:20,319 i think that what my work or the work of 1982 01:09:23,829 --> 01:09:22,080 my group is showing is that the gas 1983 01:09:25,269 --> 01:09:23,839 giants if they form by core christian 1984 01:09:27,510 --> 01:09:25,279 can really be affected by these 1985 01:09:29,269 --> 01:09:27,520 processes and i think that it's even 1986 01:09:30,550 --> 01:09:29,279 happened to here in probably the solar 1987 01:09:33,189 --> 01:09:30,560 system that 1988 01:09:35,030 --> 01:09:33,199 the evaporation by the sun the early sun 1989 01:09:36,630 --> 01:09:35,040 probably got rid of the gas which is why 1990 01:09:39,110 --> 01:09:36,640 uranus and neptune don't have much gas 1991 01:09:41,590 --> 01:09:39,120 and why we don't have that much material 1992 01:09:43,990 --> 01:09:41,600 outside i think it's already has had an 1993 01:09:45,669 --> 01:09:44,000 effect on the plant formation 1994 01:09:47,030 --> 01:09:45,679 but you're certainly right that the 1995 01:09:48,789 --> 01:09:47,040 giant plants 1996 01:09:50,550 --> 01:09:48,799 not only sir i was sort of mentioning 1997 01:09:52,070 --> 01:09:50,560 this idea of protecting us from comets 1998 01:09:54,470 --> 01:09:52,080 or something but they also serve to sort 1999 01:09:56,550 --> 01:09:54,480 of stir things up and therefore affect 2000 01:09:57,990 --> 01:09:56,560 the collision rates of things and so 2001 01:09:59,350 --> 01:09:58,000 forth and that's not something that i've 2002 01:10:00,709 --> 01:09:59,360 really looked into but i think it's a 2003 01:10:03,990 --> 01:10:00,719 good point that 2004 01:10:06,070 --> 01:10:04,000 it would be good uh for us to understand 2005 01:10:08,709 --> 01:10:06,080 you know all the different effects that 2006 01:10:11,030 --> 01:10:08,719 giant plants have on the habitability of 2007 01:10:13,669 --> 01:10:11,040 say terrestrial plants in the system 2008 01:10:16,470 --> 01:10:13,679 my guess is that for all the fact that 2009 01:10:17,990 --> 01:10:16,480 jupiter now protects us from comets 2010 01:10:19,030 --> 01:10:18,000 coming in most of the comets that are 2011 01:10:20,870 --> 01:10:19,040 coming in 2012 01:10:22,870 --> 01:10:20,880 were placed there originally 2013 01:10:24,870 --> 01:10:22,880 gravitationally by the giant planets so 2014 01:10:28,830 --> 01:10:24,880 uh you know it's just protecting against 2015 01:10:33,270 --> 01:10:31,189 place but what if there wouldn't if 2016 01:10:35,590 --> 01:10:33,280 there hadn't been a jupiter 2017 01:10:36,390 --> 01:10:35,600 you would have formed all these icy con 2018 01:10:38,470 --> 01:10:36,400 i mean 2019 01:10:39,510 --> 01:10:38,480 and and wouldn't they still be coming in 2020 01:10:42,390 --> 01:10:39,520 i mean 2021 01:10:43,830 --> 01:10:42,400 maybe it was the giant plants that threw 2022 01:10:45,189 --> 01:10:43,840 them out there but you'd have a kite 2023 01:10:47,110 --> 01:10:45,199 belt 2024 01:10:48,229 --> 01:10:47,120 right and so it seems like 2025 01:10:49,750 --> 01:10:48,239 you would have 2026 01:10:50,790 --> 01:10:49,760 you might have a very rich type of belt 2027 01:10:52,550 --> 01:10:50,800 i don't know if you didn't have photo 2028 01:10:54,470 --> 01:10:52,560 evaporation 2029 01:10:57,110 --> 01:10:54,480 and so then maybe you'd have some really 2030 01:11:00,630 --> 01:10:57,120 heavy bombardment i don't know 2031 01:11:02,470 --> 01:11:00,640 maybe they will not be disturbed as much 2032 01:11:03,350 --> 01:11:02,480 as they were in the solar system in that 2033 01:11:07,590 --> 01:11:03,360 case 2034 01:11:10,950 --> 01:11:08,870 but i think 2035 01:11:13,910 --> 01:11:10,960 so that's true that's true that big i 2036 01:11:15,270 --> 01:11:13,920 guess the kuiper belt objects 2037 01:11:16,950 --> 01:11:15,280 uh the shirt 2038 01:11:20,790 --> 01:11:16,960 period common object so i mean they're 2039 01:11:20,800 --> 01:11:24,830 it's not like their self interaction 2040 01:11:30,470 --> 01:11:28,310 yeah do we have any other questions any 2041 01:11:31,510 --> 01:11:30,480 hands raised markup 2042 01:11:34,070 --> 01:11:31,520 ah 2043 01:11:35,669 --> 01:11:34,080 thank you hey how about the magnetic 2044 01:11:38,550 --> 01:11:35,679 field of the uh 2045 01:11:40,390 --> 01:11:38,560 the star does that is that a significant 2046 01:11:42,310 --> 01:11:40,400 or not 2047 01:11:44,070 --> 01:11:42,320 well it's significant 2048 01:11:45,510 --> 01:11:44,080 in our 2049 01:11:47,830 --> 01:11:45,520 as i said we've 2050 01:11:50,070 --> 01:11:47,840 we have buried all our ignorance in this 2051 01:11:52,470 --> 01:11:50,080 alpha parameter which is uh that just 2052 01:11:54,470 --> 01:11:52,480 describes how the disc viscously evolves 2053 01:11:55,510 --> 01:11:54,480 it's a dimensionless parameter 2054 01:11:58,229 --> 01:11:55,520 and uh 2055 01:12:00,229 --> 01:11:58,239 and observationally by looking at how 2056 01:12:01,669 --> 01:12:00,239 fast this are accreting onto the star 2057 01:12:04,709 --> 01:12:01,679 which we can measure because as they 2058 01:12:06,709 --> 01:12:04,719 accrete under the star we see 2059 01:12:09,590 --> 01:12:06,719 an extra luminosity in the ultraviolet 2060 01:12:11,830 --> 01:12:09,600 we see spectral lines that can give us 2061 01:12:14,149 --> 01:12:11,840 an estimate of the mass accretion rate 2062 01:12:15,590 --> 01:12:14,159 on the star so by looking at those mass 2063 01:12:17,030 --> 01:12:15,600 secretion rates we get an idea of what 2064 01:12:18,950 --> 01:12:17,040 alpha is now we don't have any 2065 01:12:20,470 --> 01:12:18,960 theoretical understanding of why alpha 2066 01:12:22,110 --> 01:12:20,480 is that value 2067 01:12:24,630 --> 01:12:22,120 and but one idea is this 2068 01:12:26,950 --> 01:12:24,640 magneto-rotational instability now that 2069 01:12:28,630 --> 01:12:26,960 involves the magnetic field of the star 2070 01:12:31,189 --> 01:12:28,640 which then threads through the disk and 2071 01:12:33,270 --> 01:12:31,199 then the disk is sort of or is is 2072 01:12:34,070 --> 01:12:33,280 keplerian orbiting and you get a kind of 2073 01:13:17,110 --> 01:12:34,080 a 2074 01:13:19,430 --> 01:13:17,120 which is most of the disk moving 2075 01:13:21,350 --> 01:13:19,440 and so in this there's these dead zones 2076 01:13:23,270 --> 01:13:21,360 in the disc where there's not enough 2077 01:13:25,270 --> 01:13:23,280 ionization for the ions to actually move 2078 01:13:26,870 --> 01:13:25,280 the neutrals there can be these dead 2079 01:13:28,470 --> 01:13:26,880 zones and of course they may be 2080 01:13:29,990 --> 01:13:28,480 favorable then to plant formation 2081 01:13:31,590 --> 01:13:30,000 because they're not as viscously 2082 01:13:33,430 --> 01:13:31,600 evolving they're sort of sitting there 2083 01:13:35,030 --> 01:13:33,440 waiting for gravity to 2084 01:13:37,590 --> 01:13:35,040 bring things together 2085 01:13:39,430 --> 01:13:37,600 well regardless of the accretion source 2086 01:13:41,510 --> 01:13:39,440 uh you know is the presence of a 2087 01:13:42,709 --> 01:13:41,520 magnetic field sufficient to keep some 2088 01:13:46,229 --> 01:13:42,719 of the 2089 01:13:48,950 --> 01:13:46,239 disk ass around after the fuvs say has 2090 01:13:51,510 --> 01:13:48,960 uh you know liberated it from the disc 2091 01:13:53,669 --> 01:13:51,520 you know uh like for example think about 2092 01:13:56,070 --> 01:13:53,679 uh you know the there's the it's gonna 2093 01:13:58,470 --> 01:13:56,080 get too far into astronomy but there is 2094 01:13:59,910 --> 01:13:58,480 the you know the x-wind scenario 2095 01:14:03,270 --> 01:13:59,920 where there are lines threading through 2096 01:14:05,270 --> 01:14:03,280 the disk you know uh and uh and also 2097 01:14:06,709 --> 01:14:05,280 there's a whole remnant on the large 2098 01:14:08,390 --> 01:14:06,719 scale is interested in that propellant 2099 01:14:11,189 --> 01:14:08,400 you know like way beyond the disk you 2100 01:14:13,270 --> 01:14:11,199 know there is this fev that is uh 2101 01:14:15,030 --> 01:14:13,280 ablating away the cloud but the the 2102 01:14:18,310 --> 01:14:15,040 cloud itself has a remnant magnetic 2103 01:14:20,070 --> 01:14:18,320 field you know how much uh uh do the 2104 01:14:22,630 --> 01:14:20,080 does the fossil fuel from the cloud in 2105 01:14:24,950 --> 01:14:22,640 addition to you know the stars field uh 2106 01:14:27,110 --> 01:14:24,960 helping train this you know obviously at 2107 01:14:29,669 --> 01:14:27,120 some point the fuv wins but is there 2108 01:14:31,510 --> 01:14:29,679 like you know some significant uh effect 2109 01:14:33,510 --> 01:14:31,520 that helps these uh help the gas stick 2110 01:14:35,590 --> 01:14:33,520 around 2111 01:14:38,310 --> 01:14:35,600 um 2112 01:14:39,110 --> 01:14:38,320 i can't think of any to be honest i mean 2113 01:14:40,790 --> 01:14:39,120 the 2114 01:14:43,590 --> 01:14:40,800 uh 2115 01:14:45,030 --> 01:14:43,600 in the first place the 2116 01:14:46,709 --> 01:14:45,040 if there are magnetic field lines 2117 01:14:48,790 --> 01:14:46,719 threading it in some way i mean the 2118 01:14:50,790 --> 01:14:48,800 material can always fall along the lines 2119 01:14:53,110 --> 01:14:50,800 because there's no force along the lines 2120 01:14:54,630 --> 01:14:53,120 only perpendicular to the lines and so 2121 01:14:56,550 --> 01:14:54,640 uh 2122 01:14:58,390 --> 01:14:56,560 you know it would the material this 2123 01:14:59,590 --> 01:14:58,400 thermal evaporation is just one that's 2124 01:15:02,070 --> 01:14:59,600 driven by thermal pressure and it'll 2125 01:15:04,149 --> 01:15:02,080 just move along whatever well if there 2126 01:15:06,070 --> 01:15:04,159 is some sort of external field that 2127 01:15:07,189 --> 01:15:06,080 is actually controlling the motion i 2128 01:15:12,390 --> 01:15:07,199 mean i 2129 01:15:17,030 --> 01:15:14,550 the magnetic fields are pretty weak i 2130 01:15:19,189 --> 01:15:17,040 mean as as in most of our models i mean 2131 01:15:20,390 --> 01:15:19,199 it's true that right near the x-wind 2132 01:15:21,750 --> 01:15:20,400 which is the origin of these 2133 01:15:23,830 --> 01:15:21,760 protostellar winds which is just a few 2134 01:15:25,590 --> 01:15:23,840 stellar radii away in the disc those 2135 01:15:28,390 --> 01:15:25,600 fields tend to be like a kilogaster 2136 01:15:30,630 --> 01:15:28,400 they're quite high but or maybe less but 2137 01:15:32,070 --> 01:15:30,640 they're quite high but as you you get 2138 01:15:33,669 --> 01:15:32,080 out it seems that the magnetic fields 2139 01:15:35,110 --> 01:15:33,679 are getting weaker and weaker and the 2140 01:15:36,870 --> 01:15:35,120 thermal pressures tend to be quite 2141 01:15:38,950 --> 01:15:36,880 strong i have a feeling that thermal 2142 01:15:42,229 --> 01:15:38,960 pressures will pretty much dominate the 2143 01:15:46,149 --> 01:15:43,590 okay well 2144 01:15:48,310 --> 01:15:46,159 let's thank our speaker again 2145 01:15:50,149 --> 01:15:48,320 and 2146 01:15:51,270 --> 01:15:50,159 i would just like to 2147 01:15:54,149 --> 01:15:51,280 let 2148 01:15:55,990 --> 01:15:54,159 you all know that the next two 2149 01:15:58,390 --> 01:15:56,000 seminars 2150 01:16:02,229 --> 01:15:58,400 will be given by 2151 01:16:03,830 --> 01:16:02,239 bill shop on february 25th and by jodi 2152 01:16:05,270 --> 01:16:03,840 deming and 2153 01:16:07,830 --> 01:16:05,280 jim staley of the university of 2154 01:16:09,590 --> 01:16:07,840 washington on march 31st 2155 01:16:11,790 --> 01:16:09,600 bill on february 25th is going to be 2156 01:16:14,669 --> 01:16:11,800 talking about his work on looking at 2157 01:16:16,229 --> 01:16:14,679 microfossils using confocal laser 2158 01:16:18,709 --> 01:16:16,239 spectroscopy 2159 01:16:20,950 --> 01:16:18,719 and raman 2160 01:16:22,709 --> 01:16:20,960 microscopy as well and 2161 01:16:25,350 --> 01:16:22,719 jody and jim are going to be talking 2162 01:16:27,910 --> 01:16:25,360 about psychophiles and particularly 2163 01:16:29,990 --> 01:16:27,920 those organisms as models for potential 2164 01:16:33,350 --> 01:16:30,000 life on europa and mars 2165 01:16:35,350 --> 01:16:33,360 so i hope we will see all of you there 2166 01:16:38,149 --> 01:16:35,360 and others and